equalizer
Apr 22nd, 2008, 1:08 PM
Ignore this thread Cherisa can't seem to get a life and mind her own business.
View Full Version : Heres the start of my first book. Good Yes?
Cherisa
Apr 22nd, 2008, 1:33 PM
Oh wow Lazerus wrote the exact same story word for word.. hmmm how very interesting..
http://forums.worldancestry.org/showthread.php?t=192
http://forums.worldancestry.org/showthread.php?t=192
equalizer
Apr 22nd, 2008, 1:39 PM
Oh wow Lazerus wrote the exact same story word for word.. hmmm how very interesting..
Why did you do that. I was trying to see what people would say about it if they thought I wrote it. Then everyone could see how biast people are. Thanks for ruining it.
Why did you do that. I was trying to see what people would say about it if they thought I wrote it. Then everyone could see how biast people are. Thanks for ruining it.
Smoke
Apr 22nd, 2008, 1:45 PM
hey your a stupid Cunt... seriously... you think by going onto W.A and posting its shit here your gonna cause some kind of controvrsy? your a fucking moron... seriously....
Cherisa
Apr 22nd, 2008, 1:48 PM
Why did you do that. I was trying to see what people would say about it if they thought I wrote it. Then everyone could see how biast people are. Thanks for ruining it.
because I can't stand liars...::p:
because I can't stand liars...::p:
Smoke
Apr 22nd, 2008, 1:50 PM
because I can't stand liars...::p:
owned. hahaha
owned. hahaha
lycanox
Apr 22nd, 2008, 2:11 PM
And thats another rule broken by him.
equalizer
Apr 22nd, 2008, 2:14 PM
And thats another rule broken by him.
What rule its not copyrighted. Quit grasping at straws. Your getting pathetic.
What rule its not copyrighted. Quit grasping at straws. Your getting pathetic.
Smoke
Apr 22nd, 2008, 2:17 PM
whos grasping at straws copywrite infringement pussy...
Nu Kua
Apr 22nd, 2008, 2:21 PM
According to the rules, it doesn't have to be copyrighted.
5: Armageddon Online respects the original works by authors outside of this community, therefore do not post entire articles written by outside sources. Posting a paragraph or thesis on an article in reference to a thread created, and then adding a link to the source is perfectly reasonable; but posting the entire article violates international copyright laws. Posts violating such laws will be completely removed. Be smart about what is posted. If members choose not to visit a link contributed in the original thought it is their choice and leaves more room for discussion. Repeat offenders are subject to banning.
I didn't get to see the story; if he included a link to the original thread as well as crediting Laz for it, that would have made it OK.
5: Armageddon Online respects the original works by authors outside of this community, therefore do not post entire articles written by outside sources. Posting a paragraph or thesis on an article in reference to a thread created, and then adding a link to the source is perfectly reasonable; but posting the entire article violates international copyright laws. Posts violating such laws will be completely removed. Be smart about what is posted. If members choose not to visit a link contributed in the original thought it is their choice and leaves more room for discussion. Repeat offenders are subject to banning.
I didn't get to see the story; if he included a link to the original thread as well as crediting Laz for it, that would have made it OK.
equalizer
Apr 22nd, 2008, 2:23 PM
According to the rules, it doesn't have to be copyrighted.
I didn't get to see the story; if he included a link to the original thread as well as crediting Laz for it, that would have made it OK.
Well it was a mistake on my part. I was trying to prove a point thats all.
I didn't get to see the story; if he included a link to the original thread as well as crediting Laz for it, that would have made it OK.
Well it was a mistake on my part. I was trying to prove a point thats all.
Smoke
Apr 22nd, 2008, 2:25 PM
Well it was a mistake on my part. I was trying to prove a point thats all.
The only point you just proved, is that your a faggoty bitch with some sort of mental disorder,
The only point you just proved, is that your a faggoty bitch with some sort of mental disorder,
lycanox
Apr 22nd, 2008, 2:25 PM
According to the Bern convention. Everything created after april 1989 is protected.
So it definitly was copyrighted.
"If it doesn't have a copyright notice, it's not copyrighted."
This was true in the past, but today almost all major nations follow the Berne copyright convention. For example, in the USA, almost everything created privately and originally after April 1, 1989 is copyrighted and protected whether it has a notice or not. The default you should assume for other people's works is that they are copyrighted and may not be copied unless you know otherwise. There are some old works that lost protection without notice, but frankly you should not risk it unless you know for sure.
Ten Big myths about copyright explained. (http://www.templetons.com/brad/copymyths.html)
So it definitly was copyrighted.
"If it doesn't have a copyright notice, it's not copyrighted."
This was true in the past, but today almost all major nations follow the Berne copyright convention. For example, in the USA, almost everything created privately and originally after April 1, 1989 is copyrighted and protected whether it has a notice or not. The default you should assume for other people's works is that they are copyrighted and may not be copied unless you know otherwise. There are some old works that lost protection without notice, but frankly you should not risk it unless you know for sure.
Ten Big myths about copyright explained. (http://www.templetons.com/brad/copymyths.html)
equalizer
Apr 22nd, 2008, 2:37 PM
According to the Bern convention. Everything created after april 1989 is protected.
So it definitly was copyrighted.
Ten Big myths about copyright explained. (http://www.templetons.com/brad/copymyths.html)
Well if my experiment was not ruined by little miss nosey I was going to let everyone say how much they hated it. Then I was going to tell everyone who actually wrote it. Thus proving my theory.
So it definitly was copyrighted.
Ten Big myths about copyright explained. (http://www.templetons.com/brad/copymyths.html)
Well if my experiment was not ruined by little miss nosey I was going to let everyone say how much they hated it. Then I was going to tell everyone who actually wrote it. Thus proving my theory.
Fut004
Apr 22nd, 2008, 2:42 PM
Well if my experiment was not ruined by little miss nosey I was going to let everyone say how much they hated it. Then I was going to tell everyone who actually wrote it. Thus proving my theory.
But instead you got caught and now you look like an idiot for trying to set people up. Good Work, your Experiment was a success!
But instead you got caught and now you look like an idiot for trying to set people up. Good Work, your Experiment was a success!
equalizer
Apr 22nd, 2008, 2:50 PM
But instead you got caught and now you look like an idiot for trying to set people up. Good Work, your Experiment was a success!
Wrong if people were honest instead of following the pack then they would not have to worry about being set up.
Wrong if people were honest instead of following the pack then they would not have to worry about being set up.
lycanox
Apr 22nd, 2008, 2:53 PM
Well if my experiment was not ruined by little miss nosey I was going to let everyone say how much they hated it. Then I was going to tell everyone who actually wrote it. Thus proving my theory.
And if they liked it you would tell nobody and steal someones feathers.
Or were you trying to start a smear campain against laz?
And that doesnt justify breaking the law.
And if they liked it you would tell nobody and steal someones feathers.
Or were you trying to start a smear campain against laz?
And that doesnt justify breaking the law.
Fut004
Apr 22nd, 2008, 2:53 PM
Wrong if people were honest instead of following the pack then they would not have to worry about being set up.
Just because the majority of people here dislike you, it doesn't mean they're all just following the pack. They could all dislike you for their own reasons.
Just because the majority of people here dislike you, it doesn't mean they're all just following the pack. They could all dislike you for their own reasons.
equalizer
Apr 22nd, 2008, 3:05 PM
And if they liked it you would tell nobody and steal someones feathers.
Or were you trying to start a smear campain against laz?
And that doesnt justify breaking the law.
God no I miss Laz he was cool and I already said I din't know it was illegal.
Just because the majority of people here dislike you, it doesn't mean they're all just following the pack. They could all dislike you for their own reasons.
See thats were your wrong. If its a good story then it should not matter if you like the person who wrote it. Unless your afraid of what the rest of the pack will think.
Or were you trying to start a smear campain against laz?
And that doesnt justify breaking the law.
God no I miss Laz he was cool and I already said I din't know it was illegal.
Just because the majority of people here dislike you, it doesn't mean they're all just following the pack. They could all dislike you for their own reasons.
See thats were your wrong. If its a good story then it should not matter if you like the person who wrote it. Unless your afraid of what the rest of the pack will think.
Fut004
Apr 22nd, 2008, 3:08 PM
See thats were your wrong. If its a good story then it should not matter if you like the person who wrote it. Unless your afraid of what the rest of the pack will think.
I wasn't talking about the Story, I was talking about you personally.
If you posted an awesome story, all the different people who dislike you (for different reasons) may all just say they dislike your story in an attempt to hurt you.
None of that would be people following the pact.
I wasn't talking about the Story, I was talking about you personally.
If you posted an awesome story, all the different people who dislike you (for different reasons) may all just say they dislike your story in an attempt to hurt you.
None of that would be people following the pact.
olddragon
Apr 22nd, 2008, 3:11 PM
equalizer
http://i246.photobucket.com/albums/gg103/o1ddragon/MJZ1116.gif
http://i246.photobucket.com/albums/gg103/o1ddragon/MJZ1116.gif
equalizer
Apr 22nd, 2008, 3:20 PM
I wasn't talking about the Story, I was talking about you personally.
If you posted an awesome story, all the different people who dislike you (for different reasons) may all just say they dislike your story in an attempt to hurt you.
None of that would be people following the pact.
If you will kindly notice the post right above this one by olddragon it proves my point. I have even given him good rep and he attacks anyway. Hes following the pack. Case closed.
If you posted an awesome story, all the different people who dislike you (for different reasons) may all just say they dislike your story in an attempt to hurt you.
None of that would be people following the pact.
If you will kindly notice the post right above this one by olddragon it proves my point. I have even given him good rep and he attacks anyway. Hes following the pack. Case closed.
Crimepunisher
Apr 22nd, 2008, 3:31 PM
Hes following the pack. Case closed.
So does that make you James Dean? You going to go Rebel Without a Cause on us, Equalizer?
He's not following the pack. The only thing that really brings us together like this is the hatred trolls much like yourself. So enjoy the neg rep and the knowledge that you've created the "pack".
So does that make you James Dean? You going to go Rebel Without a Cause on us, Equalizer?
He's not following the pack. The only thing that really brings us together like this is the hatred trolls much like yourself. So enjoy the neg rep and the knowledge that you've created the "pack".
olddragon
Apr 22nd, 2008, 7:19 PM
If you will kindly notice the post right above this one by olddragon it proves my point. I have even given him good rep and he attacks anyway. Hes following the pack. Case closed.
I neg rep him when he neg rep me.
He is not very honest.
The way he talks to females will never be accepted by myself.
Sorry, but men do not speak (or type) that way to woman.
It simplely is uncouth.
I neg rep him when he neg rep me.
He is not very honest.
The way he talks to females will never be accepted by myself.
Sorry, but men do not speak (or type) that way to woman.
It simplely is uncouth.
brodyhyde
May 17th, 2008, 12:17 AM
The way he talks to females will never be accepted by myself.
Sorry, but men do not speak (or type) that way to woman.
It simplely is uncouth.
Thats why I don't like him.
And Equalizer, saying everyone doesn't like you because they are following the pack makes you sound like an egomaniac. Like there is some conspiracy against you. Delusions of grandeur. No one spends time thinking about you, just reacting to you.
http://i288.photobucket.com/albums/ll161/brodyhyde/1271f39e0b-1.jpg
Sorry, but men do not speak (or type) that way to woman.
It simplely is uncouth.
Thats why I don't like him.
And Equalizer, saying everyone doesn't like you because they are following the pack makes you sound like an egomaniac. Like there is some conspiracy against you. Delusions of grandeur. No one spends time thinking about you, just reacting to you.
http://i288.photobucket.com/albums/ll161/brodyhyde/1271f39e0b-1.jpg
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.1.6 Copyright © 2013 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.