Bat Attack
Sep 18th, 2009, 12:54 PM
This guy is such a friggen' tool.
http://www.reuters.com/article/vcCandidateFeed1/idUSTRE58H17S20090918
http://www.reuters.com/article/vcCandidateFeed1/idUSTRE58H17S20090918
View Full Version : Ahmadinejad, once again, denies the Holocaust...
DaKat
Sep 18th, 2009, 1:02 PM
This guy is such a friggen' tool.
[
AND, like so many other morons, he blames everything on Zionists.
[
AND, like so many other morons, he blames everything on Zionists.
lycanox
Sep 18th, 2009, 1:10 PM
He is just making those claims to piss of Israel.
Nu Kua
Sep 18th, 2009, 2:24 PM
Well, to be fair, he is making those claims because of the way researchers whose work turns up any alteration to which the Hollywood version of the Holocaust does not subscribe to already, are treated. Seriously, people have been jumped on for pointing out the fact that more than the Jews were brutally murdered. People have been jailed for questioning the numbers of deaths given as the "official figure", and for expressing verbal outrage at the destruction of Gaza as the work of Zionists extremist who control Israels governing policies, of which the United states backs with monetary and military support. People are called anti-Semitic when they express sympathy for a people living in an enclosed cage of brutal, suppressive, often violent occupation by a heartless government-
He added, "The pretext for establishing the Zionist regime is a lie; a lie which relies on an unreliable claim, a mythical claim, and the occupation of Palestine has nothing to do with the Holocaust."
Here he suggests quite clearly two things, the first being that he does not see the Holocaust as a viable reason to establish the Zionist regime, that is it a "mythical claim" to do so- he is not saying there was no Holocaust. The second being that the Holocaust had nothing to do with the Palestinian people, and he obviously feels that they are given a free reign to mistreat them all they want in order to claim there land and 'drive them into the sea'- (what a twist!) except they won't let them fish in their own sea anymore, not since a potential oil field was discovered off the coast.
But, I digress.
This, as opposed to saying there was no Nazi Holocaust, period. He is speaking of the Holocaust as a lie as the story is claimed by the Zionist regime, and that it using that incorrectly as a pretext for the massacre and dehumanization of the Palestinians is a basically, a crock of shit.
IRNA (http://www.irna.ir/En/View/FullStory/?NewsId=687273&IdLanguage=3)
Addressing Tehrani Friday prayers worshipers as pre-sermon lecturer, President Ahmadinejad said, “Our call over the past four years has been if the Holocaust claimed by the Zionist regime and its allies is true, why they (Zionists and westerners) do not allow any research on it?”
President Ahmadinejad said research on everything is free but Holocaust is the key to a sealed fact and black box.
He went on questioning, “When the event is so much important for which a land is occupied, such a war is waged, millions of people are killed, injured and made homeless, thousands of families are ruined and the Middle East is kept under the shadow of insecurity, why the black box should not be decoded so that facts and realities are revealed to all?”
By "facts" and "reality", he is speaking of the fact that some details of this terrible event in human history that do not actually question the existence that the holocaust happened, but do challenge the way the event has been used since by the Zionist extremists to shape and bend history, as well as excuse themselves from the gross mistreatment of others.
There are some theories which question details of the Holocaust which are based on stupidity, too. It's embarrassing to run across a real Jew hater, for instance. and, it's sad. And I concede it's a given that Ahmadinejad is a tad biased against Israel, as well.
But it is still a fact that in this world where the Democrats Powers decry "We'll Have Free Speech, and a Fair Trial for All!!!" when they meddle in the personal governmental affairs of countries whose land they wish to own someday, there are some things you just aren't supposed to talk about in mixed company.
It's not so unusual he be giving a speech along these lines, as it is International Quds Day. People all over the world are, in one way or another, asking similar questions today. How can one atrocity somehow excuse another from happening- especially when it's not even a matter of revenge?
Why do we let this happen anyway, as this sort of thing is really happening in other places as well, this sort of mindless suffering. In fact, my country has contributed to a large amount of suffering in the world. For people who feel Israel does this in anyway, with the Holocaust, it's a loaded subject. Here are the Arabs who are being persecuted the way the people who are persecuting them say they were mistreated- so... what? We get to treat people as badly as we've been treated?
The emotional impact alone of using the deaths of millions as a lever in getting anything is outstanding, to say the least. Other races have died, cultures been ravished, other religions have suffered great persecution, what do they have to show for it?
He added, "The pretext for establishing the Zionist regime is a lie; a lie which relies on an unreliable claim, a mythical claim, and the occupation of Palestine has nothing to do with the Holocaust."
Here he suggests quite clearly two things, the first being that he does not see the Holocaust as a viable reason to establish the Zionist regime, that is it a "mythical claim" to do so- he is not saying there was no Holocaust. The second being that the Holocaust had nothing to do with the Palestinian people, and he obviously feels that they are given a free reign to mistreat them all they want in order to claim there land and 'drive them into the sea'- (what a twist!) except they won't let them fish in their own sea anymore, not since a potential oil field was discovered off the coast.
But, I digress.
This, as opposed to saying there was no Nazi Holocaust, period. He is speaking of the Holocaust as a lie as the story is claimed by the Zionist regime, and that it using that incorrectly as a pretext for the massacre and dehumanization of the Palestinians is a basically, a crock of shit.
IRNA (http://www.irna.ir/En/View/FullStory/?NewsId=687273&IdLanguage=3)
Addressing Tehrani Friday prayers worshipers as pre-sermon lecturer, President Ahmadinejad said, “Our call over the past four years has been if the Holocaust claimed by the Zionist regime and its allies is true, why they (Zionists and westerners) do not allow any research on it?”
President Ahmadinejad said research on everything is free but Holocaust is the key to a sealed fact and black box.
He went on questioning, “When the event is so much important for which a land is occupied, such a war is waged, millions of people are killed, injured and made homeless, thousands of families are ruined and the Middle East is kept under the shadow of insecurity, why the black box should not be decoded so that facts and realities are revealed to all?”
By "facts" and "reality", he is speaking of the fact that some details of this terrible event in human history that do not actually question the existence that the holocaust happened, but do challenge the way the event has been used since by the Zionist extremists to shape and bend history, as well as excuse themselves from the gross mistreatment of others.
There are some theories which question details of the Holocaust which are based on stupidity, too. It's embarrassing to run across a real Jew hater, for instance. and, it's sad. And I concede it's a given that Ahmadinejad is a tad biased against Israel, as well.
But it is still a fact that in this world where the Democrats Powers decry "We'll Have Free Speech, and a Fair Trial for All!!!" when they meddle in the personal governmental affairs of countries whose land they wish to own someday, there are some things you just aren't supposed to talk about in mixed company.
It's not so unusual he be giving a speech along these lines, as it is International Quds Day. People all over the world are, in one way or another, asking similar questions today. How can one atrocity somehow excuse another from happening- especially when it's not even a matter of revenge?
Why do we let this happen anyway, as this sort of thing is really happening in other places as well, this sort of mindless suffering. In fact, my country has contributed to a large amount of suffering in the world. For people who feel Israel does this in anyway, with the Holocaust, it's a loaded subject. Here are the Arabs who are being persecuted the way the people who are persecuting them say they were mistreated- so... what? We get to treat people as badly as we've been treated?
The emotional impact alone of using the deaths of millions as a lever in getting anything is outstanding, to say the least. Other races have died, cultures been ravished, other religions have suffered great persecution, what do they have to show for it?
TC
Sep 18th, 2009, 2:54 PM
Umm.. I would question his meaning with; ( " so that facts and realities are revealed to all) Its a stretch that he's only referring to "method used"
ryangti
Sep 18th, 2009, 2:59 PM
President Obama, in reaching his decision to ditch a missile defense shield in Eastern Europe, used information from a May 2009 National Intelligence Estimate that said Iran would take three to five years longer than originally anticipated to build a long-range missile system, a senior administration official confirmed Friday.
He must be 100% sure they wont have nukes in the near future.
Who could possibly help Iran anyway if it is their intentions?
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/09/18/nie-used-obama-iran-long-range-missile-capacity-years-longer/
Iran if you already know about has clashes again.
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,551821,00.html?test=latestnews
An unstable country of late!
He must be 100% sure they wont have nukes in the near future.
Who could possibly help Iran anyway if it is their intentions?
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/09/18/nie-used-obama-iran-long-range-missile-capacity-years-longer/
Iran if you already know about has clashes again.
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,551821,00.html?test=latestnews
An unstable country of late!
pico
Sep 18th, 2009, 4:47 PM
Agreed that Iran is unstable... and ripe for CLIA provoked civil unrest leading to regime change. The only problem is that the CIA seems to not be the same organization that could handle these jobs as in the past. I think Obama did the right thing by backing out of the missle shield. Why defend any of the people outside of the continental US? It was not developed or funded by the useless UN, nor NATO. It seems like, if anything, the US should charge all the ungrateful assholes around the planet to be under this shield.
As for Irans leader, he is entitled to his own opinion... and don't forget that opinions and assholes are alike because all have them and they all stink. If you are a Jew, just criticize him as a left handed asswipe. Fuck him, as any intelligent person can see the multitude of evidence. My great uncle was witness to one of the camps that was liberated, and I would take his word as gospel.
As for Irans leader, he is entitled to his own opinion... and don't forget that opinions and assholes are alike because all have them and they all stink. If you are a Jew, just criticize him as a left handed asswipe. Fuck him, as any intelligent person can see the multitude of evidence. My great uncle was witness to one of the camps that was liberated, and I would take his word as gospel.
Bat Attack
Sep 18th, 2009, 5:58 PM
Agreed that Iran is unstable... and ripe for CLIA provoked civil unrest leading to regime change. The only problem is that the CIA seems to not be the same organization that could handle these jobs as in the past. I think Obama did the right thing by backing out of the missle shield. Why defend any of the people outside of the continental US? It was not developed or funded by the useless UN, nor NATO. It seems like, if anything, the US should charge all the ungrateful assholes around the planet to be under this shield.
As for Irans leader, he is entitled to his own opinion... and don't forget that opinions and assholes are alike because all have them and they all stink. If you are a Jew, just criticize him as a left handed asswipe. Fuck him, as any intelligent person can see the multitude of evidence. My great uncle was witness to one of the camps that was liberated, and I would take his word as gospel.
I agree 100%.
As for Irans leader, he is entitled to his own opinion... and don't forget that opinions and assholes are alike because all have them and they all stink. If you are a Jew, just criticize him as a left handed asswipe. Fuck him, as any intelligent person can see the multitude of evidence. My great uncle was witness to one of the camps that was liberated, and I would take his word as gospel.
I agree 100%.
mtnmanjames
Sep 18th, 2009, 6:44 PM
I agree 100%.
I also agree with both of you. Although what will happen when Isreal hits IRAN with a full out offensive. WW3 ? Will the anti-christ appear? So many questions. No answers!
I also agree with both of you. Although what will happen when Isreal hits IRAN with a full out offensive. WW3 ? Will the anti-christ appear? So many questions. No answers!
Freddy
Sep 18th, 2009, 6:46 PM
Ahmadinejad is denying the Holocaust period.
Whether he is tying it in to Israeli policy it is still denial.
There has been plenty of talk about the Holocaust as myth by the likes of The Institute for Historical Review and their ilk who never seem to find any evidence to back up their bogus claims.
The Holocaust in Europe that was perpetuated by Germany took the lives of 11 million people, including 6 million who were Jewish.
The Hidden Holocaust in Asia that was perpetuated by Japan took the lives of 25 million Asian civilians, including 16 million Chinese. Talk about denial! I would bet they never taught about it in school.
There is no law in the US that prevents a person from researching or publishing material about the Holocaust. "Holocaust denial is explicitly or implicitly illegal in 13 countries: Austria, Belgium, Czech Republic, France, Germany, Israel, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Poland, Portugal, Romania, and Switzerland." (Wikipedia.org)
Ahmadinejad does not like Israel. We get that.
However, the fact of the Holocaust occured has nothing to do with today's Middle East problems. Both Isreal and Ahmadinejad need to understand this.
Whether he is tying it in to Israeli policy it is still denial.
There has been plenty of talk about the Holocaust as myth by the likes of The Institute for Historical Review and their ilk who never seem to find any evidence to back up their bogus claims.
The Holocaust in Europe that was perpetuated by Germany took the lives of 11 million people, including 6 million who were Jewish.
The Hidden Holocaust in Asia that was perpetuated by Japan took the lives of 25 million Asian civilians, including 16 million Chinese. Talk about denial! I would bet they never taught about it in school.
There is no law in the US that prevents a person from researching or publishing material about the Holocaust. "Holocaust denial is explicitly or implicitly illegal in 13 countries: Austria, Belgium, Czech Republic, France, Germany, Israel, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Poland, Portugal, Romania, and Switzerland." (Wikipedia.org)
Ahmadinejad does not like Israel. We get that.
However, the fact of the Holocaust occured has nothing to do with today's Middle East problems. Both Isreal and Ahmadinejad need to understand this.
Reef Badlaw
Sep 18th, 2009, 7:03 PM
I deny that Ahmadinejad's 2nd election-to-office actually happened.
Sirius
Sep 18th, 2009, 7:18 PM
I deny that Ahmadinejad's 2nd election-to-office actually happened.
Oh it happened, the question is was it done with or without fraud.
Oh it happened, the question is was it done with or without fraud.
Freddy
Sep 18th, 2009, 7:19 PM
I deny that Ahmadinejad's 2nd election-to-office actually happened.
I saw on ABC World News Tonight that the state sponsered protest in Iran today turned into an anti-Ahmadinejad rally!
I saw on ABC World News Tonight that the state sponsered protest in Iran today turned into an anti-Ahmadinejad rally!
Sirius
Sep 18th, 2009, 7:37 PM
I saw on ABC World News Tonight that the state sponsered protest in Iran today turned into an anti-Ahmadinejad rally!
They call them Townhall Meetings here.
They call them Townhall Meetings here.
RhymnRzn
Sep 18th, 2009, 9:43 PM
Perhaps it is Ahmadinejad's way of expressing that he does not recognize Israel. Neither do I recognize Israel, as I line it up with all 66 books of the Holy Bible. Even there in the Holy Land they have trusted in a god of forces, and have set them selves as racially and religiously superior, unto pride and hatred, which are the same things that made those many victims, when Hitler made himself stronger than them in that widely witnessed holocaust.
I saw non-meek Hal Lindsey on T.B.N. last night, and was able to actually sit through a few minutes of plainly being told what's on those guys' minds of late, touching their Israel and so forth. Citing inconsistency with my own expectation (which is plainly stated as the Scriptures, which is not their manipulations of the Scriptures), I listened to Hal Lindsey begin to explain that the U.S.A. is receding back from helping Israel, which is both to the hurt of U.S.A.'s in the sight of the One World Order, and to Israel's, so that Israel basically has no other option but to attack Iran by spring of 2010, as their theory has it, or else they will be taken over or destroyed by Muslims. The guy even chatted about the so-called "Samson Option", in which Israel will destroy all surrounding nations, if they come under fire from the purported 50,000 missiles aimed at them. They teach hands down that we must assist Israel militarily and financially if the U.S.A. as a nation is to retain it's super-power status, its Christians, and its blessing from God: for, he said, the Spirit restraining the Anti-christ, and all the Christians, will be taken out of the way, hence, the rapture pre-tribulation. Lindsey also gave a passing about oil being up wards of 300 a barrel as a result of this war in the middle East, while he reveled about how that Israel is about to uncover the largest find of oil in the Middle East ever made.
My thought is that Israel is definitely facing the sum of all their decisions, and it is now in a weakened and divided state, and will need to be scooped off of that ground, if it is not to hit the ground to be broken in pieces altogether: whereas the way of peace, to the Zion above the mountains of the earth, is according to the prophecies of Scripture, perhaps indeed to require a deposing, and breaking up of power, so that all the children can grow up in the land together, and dwell in one land, or not all in that land, but somewhere else.
I saw non-meek Hal Lindsey on T.B.N. last night, and was able to actually sit through a few minutes of plainly being told what's on those guys' minds of late, touching their Israel and so forth. Citing inconsistency with my own expectation (which is plainly stated as the Scriptures, which is not their manipulations of the Scriptures), I listened to Hal Lindsey begin to explain that the U.S.A. is receding back from helping Israel, which is both to the hurt of U.S.A.'s in the sight of the One World Order, and to Israel's, so that Israel basically has no other option but to attack Iran by spring of 2010, as their theory has it, or else they will be taken over or destroyed by Muslims. The guy even chatted about the so-called "Samson Option", in which Israel will destroy all surrounding nations, if they come under fire from the purported 50,000 missiles aimed at them. They teach hands down that we must assist Israel militarily and financially if the U.S.A. as a nation is to retain it's super-power status, its Christians, and its blessing from God: for, he said, the Spirit restraining the Anti-christ, and all the Christians, will be taken out of the way, hence, the rapture pre-tribulation. Lindsey also gave a passing about oil being up wards of 300 a barrel as a result of this war in the middle East, while he reveled about how that Israel is about to uncover the largest find of oil in the Middle East ever made.
My thought is that Israel is definitely facing the sum of all their decisions, and it is now in a weakened and divided state, and will need to be scooped off of that ground, if it is not to hit the ground to be broken in pieces altogether: whereas the way of peace, to the Zion above the mountains of the earth, is according to the prophecies of Scripture, perhaps indeed to require a deposing, and breaking up of power, so that all the children can grow up in the land together, and dwell in one land, or not all in that land, but somewhere else.
pico
Sep 18th, 2009, 10:26 PM
They call them Townhall Meetings here.
Are they called racists for not being in agreement with him, as the opposition party here in the USSA is being titled?
Are they called racists for not being in agreement with him, as the opposition party here in the USSA is being titled?
Sirius
Sep 19th, 2009, 10:26 AM
Are they called racists for not being in agreement with him, as the opposition party here in the USSA is being titled?
Muslims use the word Infidels or something like that.
Pico, serious question, do you see anything racist about the protests against Obama? Anything at all?
Muslims use the word Infidels or something like that.
Pico, serious question, do you see anything racist about the protests against Obama? Anything at all?
pico
Sep 19th, 2009, 11:14 AM
I see nothing racist in the vast majority of the protests and protesters. While I am sure there are some ass clowns out there protesting in their bed linens and others protesting with their shaved heads, the vast majority are people who dislike the man's politics and politicies. Does that make them racists... hell no! I do not like Obama as a politician, but then I disliked SLick Willie as well. At least Obama does not come to the table with adulterous rumors and hopefully he keeps his cock caged while in office.
Sirius
Sep 19th, 2009, 11:17 AM
So you don't like him because he is a democrat.
pico
Sep 19th, 2009, 3:34 PM
Not because he is a democrat. It is his shit policies. I dislike people who vote against gun ownership for legal lawful citizens. I also dislike his healthcare reforn agenda... although I admit something needs to change, but mainly regarding lawsuits. I dislike how he lied about trying to unify the two sides, when he has done more to divide than anyone I can recall... much more so than G. Dubya. I dislike his choices for his cabinet picks as well. Treasury guru can't figure out turbo tax, but can fix the economy. BULL SHIT! He is a crook... or a fucking idiot. I think more Crook! There are many things about Obama I dislike, and while McLame was a crappy pick, he was able to work with democrats and republicans... something Obama either does not concern himself with or is incapable of doing.
TC
Sep 19th, 2009, 4:27 PM
People forget that all politicians play for the gallery, and this is the same thing ...just in another language and culture. He is well aware of the military might of the Israeli forces, and I doubt he wants any low level fighters taking out his nuclear facilities. You rattle the saber just enough to keep the popular opinion appeased.... meanwhile its business as usual behind the scenes.
Today its economics that rule...not rhetorical dogma. And he knows it.
Today its economics that rule...not rhetorical dogma. And he knows it.
Sirius
Sep 19th, 2009, 5:23 PM
Not because he is a democrat. It is his shit policies. I dislike people who vote against gun ownership for legal lawful citizens. I also dislike his healthcare reforn agenda... although I admit something needs to change, but mainly regarding lawsuits. I dislike how he lied about trying to unify the two sides, when he has done more to divide than anyone I can recall... much more so than G. Dubya. I dislike his choices for his cabinet picks as well. Treasury guru can't figure out turbo tax, but can fix the economy. BULL SHIT! He is a crook... or a fucking idiot. I think more Crook! There are many things about Obama I dislike, and while McLame was a crappy pick, he was able to work with democrats and republicans... something Obama either does not concern himself with or is incapable of doing.
What crappy policies? The only thing wrong with healthcare is lawsuits? If your daughter was dfenied a liver that would of saved her life, you wouldn't sue? Idiot? Compared to what?
The only reason this country appears divided is because Obama is black, and the majority of the republicans think he is either a Muslim, or the fucking antichrist. Read the polls, the republicans don't give a shit about the policies. When was the last time pastors asked for Bush to be killed by God. They were constantly praying for him. There are pastors on the news wishing for Obama to die. One i heard saying whoever killed him would be a martyr and go to heaven. Damn, this pastor sounds like Osama bin laden.
Was there any rallys for Bush to provide his birth certificate? Fuck, the media was attacked for calling him a coward for pretending to be in the national guard.
Bush was an opportunistic fake. He never had a successful business in his life, and look at where the country is now that he ran it for 8 years. People have short memories. If Obama has to spend 100 trillion dollars to try and fix this clusterfuck nation, then so be it. Atleast he is trying to do it for everyone, and not just the richest people in the country.
When was the last time schools around ther country were going to deny the president to be heard? it's not cause he is black?
I wish the only bad thing Bush did would have been to fuck an intern. I mean, come on atleast we would have more jobs.
Obama has tried to work with the republicans, and they have resisted from the start. the only way they will work with him is if he gives up his ideals and joins the party. what a bunch of morons. they want him to do as they say. We are not gonna go back that far in history.
Tell me rush limburger isn't a racist dude.
1. I mean, let’s face it, we didn’t have slavery in this country for over 100 years because it was a bad thing. Quite the opposite: slavery built the South. I’m not saying we should bring it back; I’m just saying it had its merits. For one thing, the streets were safer after dark.
2. You know who deserves a posthumous Medal of Honor? James Earl Ray [the confessed assassin of Martin Luther King]. We miss you, James. Godspeed.
3. Have you ever noticed how all composite pictures of wanted criminals resemble Jesse Jackson?
4. Right. So you go into Darfur and you go into South Africa, you get rid of the white government there. You put sanctions on them. You stand behind Nelson Mandela — who was bankrolled by communists for a time, had the support of certain communist leaders. You go to Ethiopia. You do the same thing.
5. Look, let me put it to you this way: the NFL all too often looks like a game between the Bloods and the Crips without any weapons. There, I said it.
6. The NAACP should have riot rehearsal. They should get a liquor store and practice robberies.
7. They’re 12 percent of the population. Who the hell cares?
8. Take that bone out of your nose and call me back(to an African American female caller).
9. I think the media has been very desirous that a black quarterback do well. They’re interested in black coaches and black quarterbacks doing well. I think there’s a little hope invested in McNabb and he got a lot of credit for the performance of his team that he really didn’t deserve
10. Limbaugh attacks on Obama. Limbaugh has called Obama a ‘halfrican American’ has said that Obama was not black but Arab because Kenya is an Arab region, even though Arabs are less than one percent of Kenya. Since mainstream America has become more accepting of African-Americans, Limbaugh has decided to play against its new racial fears, Arabs and Muslims. Despite the fact Obama graduated magna cum laude from Harvard Law school, Limbaugh has called him an ‘affirmative action candidate.’ Limbaugh even has repeatedly played a song on his radio show ‘Barack the Magic Negro’ using an antiquated Jim Crow era term for black a man who many Americans are supporting for president. Way to go Rush.
Lets not forget Glenn Beck saying on air, that Obama has a deep seated hatred of white people.
if the country does divide in the future, i'm going left.
What crappy policies? The only thing wrong with healthcare is lawsuits? If your daughter was dfenied a liver that would of saved her life, you wouldn't sue? Idiot? Compared to what?
The only reason this country appears divided is because Obama is black, and the majority of the republicans think he is either a Muslim, or the fucking antichrist. Read the polls, the republicans don't give a shit about the policies. When was the last time pastors asked for Bush to be killed by God. They were constantly praying for him. There are pastors on the news wishing for Obama to die. One i heard saying whoever killed him would be a martyr and go to heaven. Damn, this pastor sounds like Osama bin laden.
Was there any rallys for Bush to provide his birth certificate? Fuck, the media was attacked for calling him a coward for pretending to be in the national guard.
Bush was an opportunistic fake. He never had a successful business in his life, and look at where the country is now that he ran it for 8 years. People have short memories. If Obama has to spend 100 trillion dollars to try and fix this clusterfuck nation, then so be it. Atleast he is trying to do it for everyone, and not just the richest people in the country.
When was the last time schools around ther country were going to deny the president to be heard? it's not cause he is black?
I wish the only bad thing Bush did would have been to fuck an intern. I mean, come on atleast we would have more jobs.
Obama has tried to work with the republicans, and they have resisted from the start. the only way they will work with him is if he gives up his ideals and joins the party. what a bunch of morons. they want him to do as they say. We are not gonna go back that far in history.
Tell me rush limburger isn't a racist dude.
1. I mean, let’s face it, we didn’t have slavery in this country for over 100 years because it was a bad thing. Quite the opposite: slavery built the South. I’m not saying we should bring it back; I’m just saying it had its merits. For one thing, the streets were safer after dark.
2. You know who deserves a posthumous Medal of Honor? James Earl Ray [the confessed assassin of Martin Luther King]. We miss you, James. Godspeed.
3. Have you ever noticed how all composite pictures of wanted criminals resemble Jesse Jackson?
4. Right. So you go into Darfur and you go into South Africa, you get rid of the white government there. You put sanctions on them. You stand behind Nelson Mandela — who was bankrolled by communists for a time, had the support of certain communist leaders. You go to Ethiopia. You do the same thing.
5. Look, let me put it to you this way: the NFL all too often looks like a game between the Bloods and the Crips without any weapons. There, I said it.
6. The NAACP should have riot rehearsal. They should get a liquor store and practice robberies.
7. They’re 12 percent of the population. Who the hell cares?
8. Take that bone out of your nose and call me back(to an African American female caller).
9. I think the media has been very desirous that a black quarterback do well. They’re interested in black coaches and black quarterbacks doing well. I think there’s a little hope invested in McNabb and he got a lot of credit for the performance of his team that he really didn’t deserve
10. Limbaugh attacks on Obama. Limbaugh has called Obama a ‘halfrican American’ has said that Obama was not black but Arab because Kenya is an Arab region, even though Arabs are less than one percent of Kenya. Since mainstream America has become more accepting of African-Americans, Limbaugh has decided to play against its new racial fears, Arabs and Muslims. Despite the fact Obama graduated magna cum laude from Harvard Law school, Limbaugh has called him an ‘affirmative action candidate.’ Limbaugh even has repeatedly played a song on his radio show ‘Barack the Magic Negro’ using an antiquated Jim Crow era term for black a man who many Americans are supporting for president. Way to go Rush.
Lets not forget Glenn Beck saying on air, that Obama has a deep seated hatred of white people.
if the country does divide in the future, i'm going left.
JenaS62
Sep 19th, 2009, 8:24 PM
My dislike for Obama has absolutely nothing to do with race although I acknowledge that for some people in this country - it probably is an issue. I don't like Obama and I did not like McCain. I didn't like GW, I did not like Clinton, I did not like Bush Sr. I think the last president I sort of liked was Reagan (and that was probably because I had no clue about politics back then) and I don't see any hope for me to like any future presidents either since my preferred political party has a snow ball's chance in hell of taking the helm.
Freddy
Sep 19th, 2009, 9:09 PM
The only candidate for president who I voted for and actually won was Richard Milhouse Nixon. I have voted in every election held since 1972.
Raptor Witness
Sep 20th, 2009, 4:14 AM
Iran's main source of income is oil. This man's rhetoric helps their economy big time. His animosity towards Israel is useful in terms of dollars, to the tune of billions.
Why is it that the False Prophet(electronic media) will look for the real motive for every high publicity criminal case in the United States, but when it comes to something as obvious and simple as Iran, they completely ignore the truth? The answer is easy, the mainstream news media are the False Prophet.
Without repentance, Iran has no future. They can deny anything they want, but regardless .... .... their future has been written, signed, sealed, and delivered. No Mahdi, born or buried can protect you from this plague.
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2621/3936893168_e744f0bbf4_o.jpg
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2552/3936064349_542ccae542_o.jpg
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3509/3936844352_eb16f1aff4_b.jpg
Why is it that the False Prophet(electronic media) will look for the real motive for every high publicity criminal case in the United States, but when it comes to something as obvious and simple as Iran, they completely ignore the truth? The answer is easy, the mainstream news media are the False Prophet.
Without repentance, Iran has no future. They can deny anything they want, but regardless .... .... their future has been written, signed, sealed, and delivered. No Mahdi, born or buried can protect you from this plague.
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2621/3936893168_e744f0bbf4_o.jpg
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2552/3936064349_542ccae542_o.jpg
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3509/3936844352_eb16f1aff4_b.jpg
HorrorReporter
Sep 20th, 2009, 9:39 AM
I am always curious to ask Holocaust deniers if they think hitler killed gypsies and christians (which he did) in the millions. Or do they just deny Jewish deaths. Trouble in, when push comes to shove, most Holocaust deniers don't deny it around other people..
lycanox
Sep 20th, 2009, 9:47 AM
Depends on who you ask.
Real nazies consider the entire holocaust a fake and quickly accuse the US of essentially doing the same thing.
Israel bashers usually only diminish the numbers.
While neonazies that don't mind gays or Jews. Only deny the genocide on the groups they support.
Real nazies consider the entire holocaust a fake and quickly accuse the US of essentially doing the same thing.
Israel bashers usually only diminish the numbers.
While neonazies that don't mind gays or Jews. Only deny the genocide on the groups they support.
ryangti
Sep 20th, 2009, 3:54 PM
Dont worry Israel according to russia will not attack iran.
Israel promised Russia it would not launch an attack on Iran, Russian President Dmitry Medvedev said in an interview aired on Sunday in which he described such an assault as "the worst thing that can be imagined."
Ha ha iran will be laughing and saying we cannot be touched!
http://www.reuters.com/article/topNews/idUSTRE58J0NQ20090920
Israel promised Russia it would not launch an attack on Iran, Russian President Dmitry Medvedev said in an interview aired on Sunday in which he described such an assault as "the worst thing that can be imagined."
Ha ha iran will be laughing and saying we cannot be touched!
http://www.reuters.com/article/topNews/idUSTRE58J0NQ20090920
ryangti
Sep 21st, 2009, 1:47 PM
Yesterday and today now another story
Israel has not given up the option of a military strike on Iran's nuclear program, the chief of Israel's military and a senior Israeli official said on Monday, refuting remarks made over the weekend by Russian President Dmitry Medvedev.
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,552900,00.html
Israel has not given up the option of a military strike on Iran's nuclear program, the chief of Israel's military and a senior Israeli official said on Monday, refuting remarks made over the weekend by Russian President Dmitry Medvedev.
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,552900,00.html
Cartesiantheater
Sep 21st, 2009, 6:29 PM
I dislike how he lied about trying to unify the two sides, when he has done more to divide than anyone I can recall... much more so than G. Dubya. I
Dude, you are COMPLETELY full of SHIT on this one. He has changed his ideals for health care he was pushing for SEVERAL TIMES because conservatives didn't like it. He has made concessions every step of the way, including the concession of possibly eliminating a public option.
Name ONE concession from the right on this issue.
Bottom line is that the republicans have fought each and every step he has taken EVEN when he has modified his position to be more friendly to the political center.
I wish you conservatives would stop lying: you don't even WANT a "president for everyone." You want NO compromise. You want exactly what your party line pushes for, and you want to compromise NOTHING. At least Obama has ATTEMPTED to compromise despite criticism from his own party. Yet no one from the right acknowledges that fact...
Dude, you are COMPLETELY full of SHIT on this one. He has changed his ideals for health care he was pushing for SEVERAL TIMES because conservatives didn't like it. He has made concessions every step of the way, including the concession of possibly eliminating a public option.
Name ONE concession from the right on this issue.
Bottom line is that the republicans have fought each and every step he has taken EVEN when he has modified his position to be more friendly to the political center.
I wish you conservatives would stop lying: you don't even WANT a "president for everyone." You want NO compromise. You want exactly what your party line pushes for, and you want to compromise NOTHING. At least Obama has ATTEMPTED to compromise despite criticism from his own party. Yet no one from the right acknowledges that fact...
Beatnik Bob
Sep 21st, 2009, 8:12 PM
I have some relatives on the Polish side of my family who were never seen again after Hitler invaded. (Treblinka I think).
So I'm pretty sure the holocaust actually happened...
While zionists really have been destroying the palestinian people, Iran is still completely full of shit. When the palestinians were being gunned down, denied human rights, and forced into the gaza ghetto, what was Iran doing?
When palestinian refugees started fleeing their homes, I didn't see Iran give a shit about them.
The ultimate loser here: the palestinians, because Israel suppresses them and Iran is using them for propaganda purposes, when the Iranian people could care less about actually helping out the palestinians...they just want to kill israelis.
The only thing Achmedinejad cares about is spreading racism and hatred for political appeal--he couldn't really care less about palestinians. And the sad part is I can't say israeli zionists are any better.
So I'm pretty sure the holocaust actually happened...
While zionists really have been destroying the palestinian people, Iran is still completely full of shit. When the palestinians were being gunned down, denied human rights, and forced into the gaza ghetto, what was Iran doing?
When palestinian refugees started fleeing their homes, I didn't see Iran give a shit about them.
The ultimate loser here: the palestinians, because Israel suppresses them and Iran is using them for propaganda purposes, when the Iranian people could care less about actually helping out the palestinians...they just want to kill israelis.
The only thing Achmedinejad cares about is spreading racism and hatred for political appeal--he couldn't really care less about palestinians. And the sad part is I can't say israeli zionists are any better.
RhymnRzn
Sep 21st, 2009, 8:46 PM
I heard Netanyahu will walk out during Ahmadinejad's speech. That with Obama Admin's statement that they are not expecting any great offering in the Israel/Palestine/Middle East peace process. Methinks these men need to come down off the stacks and sit in the dust, compared to all the traffic moving economic, political, and military agendas.
Isaiah 28:12
To whom he said, This is the rest wherewith ye may cause the weary to rest; and this is the refreshing: yet they would not hear.
Isaiah 28:12
To whom he said, This is the rest wherewith ye may cause the weary to rest; and this is the refreshing: yet they would not hear.
Reef Badlaw
Sep 21st, 2009, 9:21 PM
Well, one thing that Israel and Iran can agree on, thanks to Putin... Obama's an amateur.
Freddy
Sep 21st, 2009, 9:33 PM
I heard Netanyahu will walk out during Ahmadinejad's speech. That with Obama Admin's statement that they are not expecting any great offering in the Israel/Palestine/Middle East peace process. Methinks these men need to come down off the stacks and sit in the dust, compared to all the traffic moving economic, political, and military agendas.
Isaiah 28:12
How does this dirt bag get to address the UN?
"Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, who sparked outrage last week by again calling the Holocaust a “myth,” will bring a message of peace to the United Nations General Assembly this week, an aide said.
Ahmadinejad’s “most important message this year is to have peace and friendship with all nations and exchanges that are based on justice and mutual respect,” Mohammad Jafar Mohammadzadeh, an information deputy in the president’s office, told the state-run Islamic Republic News Agency."
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=akFiYHtDGEwc
Isaiah 28:12
How does this dirt bag get to address the UN?
"Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, who sparked outrage last week by again calling the Holocaust a “myth,” will bring a message of peace to the United Nations General Assembly this week, an aide said.
Ahmadinejad’s “most important message this year is to have peace and friendship with all nations and exchanges that are based on justice and mutual respect,” Mohammad Jafar Mohammadzadeh, an information deputy in the president’s office, told the state-run Islamic Republic News Agency."
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=akFiYHtDGEwc
RhymnRzn
Sep 21st, 2009, 9:49 PM
How does this dirt bag get to address the UN?
Is it on the merit of giving a speech at the U.N., that all men should fear to sit and listen, lest they legitimize them? I am no enemy or friend to the man, but based on what comes upon even the least of them who are on his account. If he wants to talk, it might just be all that it is, talk; or if he wants to kick, and fight, let us see how much of the miraculous is actually on his side.
Is it on the merit of giving a speech at the U.N., that all men should fear to sit and listen, lest they legitimize them? I am no enemy or friend to the man, but based on what comes upon even the least of them who are on his account. If he wants to talk, it might just be all that it is, talk; or if he wants to kick, and fight, let us see how much of the miraculous is actually on his side.
ryangti
Sep 22nd, 2009, 1:07 PM
Iran today says it is now stronger from an attack from Israel.
Iran's President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad claimed Tuesday his country is now stronger than ever and warned that Iranian military will retaliate with full might against anyone who dares attack it.
He obviously wants a war it seems and could eventually push Israel into waging a war against iran?
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,553442,00.html
Iran's President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad claimed Tuesday his country is now stronger than ever and warned that Iranian military will retaliate with full might against anyone who dares attack it.
He obviously wants a war it seems and could eventually push Israel into waging a war against iran?
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,553442,00.html
3rDShifT
Sep 22nd, 2009, 1:23 PM
Muslims have a right to live in this filthy world as much as anybody. But don't tell me the holocaust was bullsh*t. The nazi A-holes put babies in ovens FFS!!!!!
ryangti
Sep 22nd, 2009, 3:56 PM
The uk is banning immigrants from calais today must be economical reasons even though we are fighting in afghanistan.
THERE have been fresh calls to ban Germany's neo-Nazi NPD party after it sent letters to several ethnic minority candidates in this weekend's general election, telling them to "go home".
The world becomes more racist!
http://www.news.com.au/story/0,27574,26113608-401,00.html
Although this is another topic i see that israel and the us or even the uk want ethnic cleansing and not all about nukes?
I do still stay that this was bush's real intentions the threat of being over ruled by immigrants scared him.
Even though there are across the world since after 9/11 people attitudes changed towards those from muslim or religious countries who are seen as a threat.
I ask this question is the irananian leader that bad or is it us who are worse and want to start wars but wont admit it?
THERE have been fresh calls to ban Germany's neo-Nazi NPD party after it sent letters to several ethnic minority candidates in this weekend's general election, telling them to "go home".
The world becomes more racist!
http://www.news.com.au/story/0,27574,26113608-401,00.html
Although this is another topic i see that israel and the us or even the uk want ethnic cleansing and not all about nukes?
I do still stay that this was bush's real intentions the threat of being over ruled by immigrants scared him.
Even though there are across the world since after 9/11 people attitudes changed towards those from muslim or religious countries who are seen as a threat.
I ask this question is the irananian leader that bad or is it us who are worse and want to start wars but wont admit it?
pico
Sep 22nd, 2009, 8:20 PM
I understand the many germans' feeling towards the turks and such. Before the unification of the two Germanies, the Turks did all the shit work in West Germany. Now they have East Germans to do the crap work, and the East Germans do not like to compete with this ethnic group. The same thing is here in the US with the illegals taking jobs from the lower classes.
ryangti
Sep 25th, 2009, 11:13 AM
West demands access to Iran's secret underground nuclear site.
Oh no not another Iraq invasion surely?
The West warned Iran today that it will face fresh sanctions by December unless it can persuade the world of a “profound change” in its nuclear stance after the existence of its secret underground uranium enrichment plant was uncovered.
Even more determination for Israel to attack well probably not but certainly hots things up.
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/article6849287.ece#cid=OTC-RSS&attr=797093
China goes on to say
China rejected the idea Thursday that more sanctions would pressure Iran to give up its nuclear program.
Not surprising really as would have expected a report like this.
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,555123,00.html
I smell a war happening shortly unless its just empty vessels making the most noise.
Bin Laden Warns Europe of Retaliation as you may have read an earlier thread where germany has been threatened three times.
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,555522,00.html
Oh no not another Iraq invasion surely?
The West warned Iran today that it will face fresh sanctions by December unless it can persuade the world of a “profound change” in its nuclear stance after the existence of its secret underground uranium enrichment plant was uncovered.
Even more determination for Israel to attack well probably not but certainly hots things up.
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/article6849287.ece#cid=OTC-RSS&attr=797093
China goes on to say
China rejected the idea Thursday that more sanctions would pressure Iran to give up its nuclear program.
Not surprising really as would have expected a report like this.
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,555123,00.html
I smell a war happening shortly unless its just empty vessels making the most noise.
Bin Laden Warns Europe of Retaliation as you may have read an earlier thread where germany has been threatened three times.
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,555522,00.html
pico
Sep 25th, 2009, 11:23 AM
Fresh sanctions means more bullshit and no real action on the part of the UN. China will block any real action against Iran, and while Russia acts like it is against Iranian nuclear capability, they would never actually ally themselves with anything that is supported by the US that involves military action. Relax. If anything happens, it will be done by Israel and will likely lead to World War.
ryangti
Sep 25th, 2009, 11:27 AM
Im am relaxed honestly Israel does bother me slightly though.
I found this article from yesterday.
State-run Chinese companies are selling gasoline to Iran, a move that could undermine US pressure on Tehran to give up its nuclear program, traders and a newspaper report said on Wednesday.
So if we push then china will only be more determined to help Iran.
http://www.dailystar.com.lb/article.asp?edition_id=10&categ_id=2&article_id=106738
I smell propaganda.
I found this article from yesterday.
State-run Chinese companies are selling gasoline to Iran, a move that could undermine US pressure on Tehran to give up its nuclear program, traders and a newspaper report said on Wednesday.
So if we push then china will only be more determined to help Iran.
http://www.dailystar.com.lb/article.asp?edition_id=10&categ_id=2&article_id=106738
I smell propaganda.
ryangti
Sep 25th, 2009, 2:35 PM
Have you heard the latest?
President Obama, along with the leaders of Britain and France, will "regret" accusing Iran of hiding a nuclear facility, Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said Friday.
Yeah yeah heard it all before i do wonder what would start another conflict?
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/09/25/accuse-iran-building-secret-nuke-plant/
President Obama, along with the leaders of Britain and France, will "regret" accusing Iran of hiding a nuclear facility, Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said Friday.
Yeah yeah heard it all before i do wonder what would start another conflict?
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/09/25/accuse-iran-building-secret-nuke-plant/
Raptor Witness
Sep 25th, 2009, 5:51 PM
Hmmmm .... a new "secret" enrichment facility. Why am I not surprised. :cool14:
[Sept. 20, 2009 - 5:14 AM] (http://forums.armageddononline.org/showpost.php?p=318051&postcount=25)
Without repentance, Iran has no future. They can deny ANYTHING they want, but regardless .... .... their future has been written, signed, sealed, and delivered. No Mahdi, born or buried can protect you from this plague.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kQskudZRy7E
[Sept. 20, 2009 - 5:14 AM] (http://forums.armageddononline.org/showpost.php?p=318051&postcount=25)
Without repentance, Iran has no future. They can deny ANYTHING they want, but regardless .... .... their future has been written, signed, sealed, and delivered. No Mahdi, born or buried can protect you from this plague.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kQskudZRy7E
HindSight
Sep 25th, 2009, 9:40 PM
Don't you love all the 'secret' spue that everyone already knows but shh ... it's secret. Don't pick on Mahdi. He already came.
Raptor Witness
Sep 25th, 2009, 10:48 PM
Don't you love all the 'secret' spue that everyone already knows but shh ... it's secret. Don't pick on Mahdi. He already came.
I have no beef with their "Mahdi," except that to rely on an unseen power for protection at this point is very foolish.
I have no beef with their "Mahdi," except that to rely on an unseen power for protection at this point is very foolish.
ryangti
Sep 26th, 2009, 1:17 AM
Deja vu!
It begins to sound like Iraq all over again but we hope lessons have been learnt that going all guns blazing doesnt solve a thing.
It says according to faux news that the options left for sanctions against Iran are drying up,so the question is what to do about it.
As renewed verbal hostilities between the U.S. and Iran threaten to derail the prospect of diplomatic talks, President Obama may find there are few diplomatic options left to stop the Islamic regime from pursuing nuclear technology.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/09/25/iranian-charge-threatens-overwhelm-obamas-diplomatic-options/
I have asked this question as we can see sanctions are obviously not working but making them even more determined to stick up their middle finger at us.
It begins to sound like Iraq all over again but we hope lessons have been learnt that going all guns blazing doesnt solve a thing.
It says according to faux news that the options left for sanctions against Iran are drying up,so the question is what to do about it.
As renewed verbal hostilities between the U.S. and Iran threaten to derail the prospect of diplomatic talks, President Obama may find there are few diplomatic options left to stop the Islamic regime from pursuing nuclear technology.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/09/25/iranian-charge-threatens-overwhelm-obamas-diplomatic-options/
I have asked this question as we can see sanctions are obviously not working but making them even more determined to stick up their middle finger at us.
HindSight
Sep 27th, 2009, 10:22 AM
Sincerely if I were a country, I would stick my middle finger up at the U.S. too. I would to any other country that tried to tell my country what to do. Who does the U.S. think they are, Hitler?
This is a rhetorical question and I'm just making a point. Each nation has its own government for a reason. The last I knew, 'dictators' are a bad thing to have. The last I heard, living under a dictator sucks.
JMHO
This is a rhetorical question and I'm just making a point. Each nation has its own government for a reason. The last I knew, 'dictators' are a bad thing to have. The last I heard, living under a dictator sucks.
JMHO
Prism
Sep 27th, 2009, 10:30 AM
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,556145,00.html
Missile tests, capable of reaching of Israel and parts of Europe. It sounds like 2003 all over again.
Missile tests, capable of reaching of Israel and parts of Europe. It sounds like 2003 all over again.
ryangti
Sep 27th, 2009, 12:49 PM
I think this one will be different as the world has changed a lot since 9/11 and have become more cautious of any such threat from that part of the world.
China obviously wont help which becomes i suppose an even greater risk,America itself but wont admit is no longer the almighty powerful country.
Have not heard from Russia yet chavez also becomes another thats befriending Iran.
I have come to some conclusion they are beginning to gang up on the us do you think the same?
Venezuela's science and technology minister said his country is working with Russia to detect deposits of uranium but withdrew an earlier denial that the country was also working with Iran.
See what i mean!
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,556140,00.html?test=latestnews
Its all coming in now as we have come to expect from the media.
Iran to test fire missile capable of hitting Israel.
Dont panic yet id say but be weary of the next few weeks or months,unless it calms down again.
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/middle_east/article6851238.ece#cid=OTC-RSS&attr=797093
China obviously wont help which becomes i suppose an even greater risk,America itself but wont admit is no longer the almighty powerful country.
Have not heard from Russia yet chavez also becomes another thats befriending Iran.
I have come to some conclusion they are beginning to gang up on the us do you think the same?
Venezuela's science and technology minister said his country is working with Russia to detect deposits of uranium but withdrew an earlier denial that the country was also working with Iran.
See what i mean!
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,556140,00.html?test=latestnews
Its all coming in now as we have come to expect from the media.
Iran to test fire missile capable of hitting Israel.
Dont panic yet id say but be weary of the next few weeks or months,unless it calms down again.
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/middle_east/article6851238.ece#cid=OTC-RSS&attr=797093
Raptor Witness
Sep 27th, 2009, 8:51 PM
Who else could be capable of negotiating a real peace treaty with Israel, but the Mahdi himself? What possible credentials, military or otherwise, would a European leader have for making such a treaty? They'll wait for their Mahdi to appear before making any peace treaty.
I expect that he'll walk out of a tomb, just like Jesus.
I expect that he'll walk out of a tomb, just like Jesus.
Raptor Witness
Sep 28th, 2009, 3:24 AM
Who wears a blue turban and comes in the name of peace?
Sounds like he nailed it to me. How many peaces of this puzzle still elude you?
The better question is, what kind of war will it take to get really serious about Middle East peace in our time? I'm betting it will take poison gas and nuclear weapons. Nothing else will be horrible enough to get this whole peace treaty thing set up. Nothing else will be horrible enough to create the need for a single man to lead these blue turbans. I'm not saying he will necessarily be a Muslim, but I am saying that there's no way this person could easily gain the trust of the Islamic world, unless he was believed to be very special spiritually, or trusted completely not to take one side or the other.
http://img204.imageshack.us/img204/401/4217245856sf6.jpg (http://images.google.com/images?hl=en&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&um=1&sa=1&q=UN+soldiers&aq=f&oq=&aqi=g1&start=0)
Sounds like he nailed it to me. How many peaces of this puzzle still elude you?
The better question is, what kind of war will it take to get really serious about Middle East peace in our time? I'm betting it will take poison gas and nuclear weapons. Nothing else will be horrible enough to get this whole peace treaty thing set up. Nothing else will be horrible enough to create the need for a single man to lead these blue turbans. I'm not saying he will necessarily be a Muslim, but I am saying that there's no way this person could easily gain the trust of the Islamic world, unless he was believed to be very special spiritually, or trusted completely not to take one side or the other.
http://img204.imageshack.us/img204/401/4217245856sf6.jpg (http://images.google.com/images?hl=en&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&um=1&sa=1&q=UN+soldiers&aq=f&oq=&aqi=g1&start=0)
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.1.6 Copyright © 2013 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.