Do Not Fly on Ark Excavation Day!

[Garry Denke]

Do Not Fly on Ark Excavation Day!

http://www.technopagans.co.uk/H18.JPG

Exodus’ 4 winged gold ark (Rev’s ‘throne’) and Ezekiel’s 4 iron wheels are under Heelstone’s 2 flying eagle wings overhanging open ground. Heelstone’s lion head (top) is weathered-damaged, but its huge calf head (under right wing), wounded man face (under left wing), and 2 eagle wings (centering them), are still visible from the 7 stone archway. Rammed in the bottom-half of Heelstone’s 30m (100ft) circumference ditch is Carboniferous white stone (fossiliferous limestone) from South Wales. 3/4's of the ‘missing’ Counterscarp (Stonehenge’s outermost bank) is such Carboniferous white limestone, ~19 tons of it, the balance being Stonehenge Mound itself, ~281 tons. Located 100m (328ft) E-SE of Heelstone is such piled white limestone Stonehenge Mound resting on more artefacts over Cretaceous white chalk. The Mound and its artefacts are encircled by ~65 tons of Carboniferous black stone (fossiliferous coal) and Carboniferous pale grit (basically sandstone) from South Wales. Rammed in the bottom-half of its 113m (369ft) circumference ditch is such Carboniferous black coal and pale grit. Exodus’ gold table, gold altar, etc. (the balance of Exodus 37-40 ‘missing’ artefacts) are inside Stonehenge Mound. The white elders (older fossils) in such Carboniferous white limestone of 1/4 Counterscarp bank, 3/4 Stonehenge Mound - Heelstone Ditch bottom-half, differentiate these rocks from Stonehenge’s natural outcrop; Cretaceous white chalk, because it contains much younger fossils. Many of these fossils were originally quite large, easily identified before their fragmentation, caused by moving and crushing them. Stonehenge Heelstone Sculpture having 2 wings centering 4 beasts (described above), 24 white elders (identifying fossils) surrounding them in its ditch, and the 10000 x 10000 (1000s of 1000s) of white chalk fossils (younger identifiers), all located over/around Exodus’ 4 winged gold ark (Rev’s ‘throne’), total 6 wings (2 above GL, 4 below GL). Denoco Inc. (DI) 1984 geophysical surveys and English Heritage (EH) Ancient Monument Laboratory (AML) Archaeometry Branch (AB) 1994 geophysical surveys of Heelstone’s rectangular artefact anomaly show centering almost exactly plumb (directly below) the midpoint of Heelstone’s 2 wings overhanging such open ground. The rate of change of deviation from vertical of the Southwest (SW) leaning Heelstone since burial of Exodus’ 4 winged gold ark (Rev’s ‘throne’) below its 2 wings has been been calculated, and is 10cm (4in) per ~2000yrs. This is assuming that the artefact was centered perfectly plumb with the midpoint of Heelstone’s 2 wings at the time of burial. If it was, then this centering vertical plane alignment of the 2 wings above GL and 4 wings below GL would, from DI's 1984 and EHAMLAB’s 1994 geophysical surveys, make the calculation of 5cm (2in) per ~1000yrs for Heelstone movement valid. If it was not, then such rate of change of deviation from vertical would be invalid, unless the survey results are simply off center themselves. In any case, Exodus’ 4 winged gold ark (Rev’s ‘throne’) is not directly under Heelstone’s base, its 4 wings are under open ground directly below Heelstone’s overhanging 2 wings, offset by 10cm (4in). So the Heelstone does not have to be moved to retrieve Exodus’ 4 winged gold ark (Rev’s ‘throne’) rectangular artefact, whose long axis parallels the 4 Station Stones’ rectanglular long axis located SW of it, according to the 1984 and 1994 geophysical surveys. Watch the magnetic reversal (polar flip) on excavation day, at exhumation hour, of the Stonehenge Heelstone artefact. Remember to shut down your computer(s) on such day, magnetic reversals damage electronics, even surge protectors, and planes, automobiles, satellites, etc.

http://www.eumetsat.de/en/area2/image/may98/images/satellites.jpg

Do Not Fly on Ark Excavation Day!

[stewey]

Give me what you are smoking please. Your claims are way out there and bogus.

[Garry Denke]

Give me what you are smoking please.
And did those feet in ancient times walk upon England’s mountains green? And was the holy lamb of god, on England’s pleasant pastures seen?

And did the Countenance Divine shine forth upon our clouded hills? And was Jerusalem builded here among these dark satanic mills?

Bring me my bow of burning gold! Bring me my arrows of desire! Bring me my spear! O clouds, unfold! Bring me my chariot of fire!

I will not cease from mental fight, nor shall my sword sleep in my hand, till we have built Jerusalem in England's green and pleasant land.

[lazserus]

Wow, that sounds like sayings from the Crusades. It's nice to know some of us still think the year is 1138AD.

Moved to Religion.

[Garry Denke]

Wow, that sounds like sayings from the Crusades. It's nice to know some of us still think the year is 1138AD.

Moved to Religion.

What year is it BTW, lazserus?
Thanks for moving the thread.

Garry Denke,
Earth Walker

[VegasRonin]

So the Heelstone does not have to be moved to retrieve Exodus’ 4 winged gold ark (Rev’s ‘throne’) rectangular artefact, whose long axis parallels the 4 Station Stones’ rectanglular long axis located SW of it, according to the 1984 and 1994 geophysical surveys. Watch the magnetic reversal (polar flip) on excavation day, at exhumation hour, of the Stonehenge Heelstone artefact. Uh, so when is Excavation Day?

[Garry Denke]

Uh, so when is Excavation Day?

Hi VegasRonin

Whenever EHAML-WANT (English Heritage, Ancient Monuments Laboratory - Wessex Archaeology, National Trust) 's to.

Graviton's machined... Graviton's ready... Graviton's everywhere...

E=(hc^5/G)^1/2
4.9038802 x 10^9 kg-m^2/s^2 = [(6.6260687 x 10^-34 kg-m^2/s)
(2.4216061 x 10^42 m^5/s^5)/(6.6723641 x 10^-11 m^3/kg-s^2)]^1/2
4.9038802 x 10^9 kg-m^2/s^2 = 4.9038802 x 10^9 kg-m^2/s^2
[rsu 3.9 x 10^-8]

E=c^5/Gv
4.9038802 x 10^9 kg-m^2/s^2 = (2.4216061 x 10^42 m^5/s^5)/
(6.6723641 x 10^-11 m^3/kg-s^2)(7.4008894 x 10^42 /s)
4.9038802 x 10^9 kg-m^2/s^2 = 4.9038802 x 10^9 kg-m^2/s^2
[rsu 3.9 x 10^-8]

E=hc^3/Gm
4.9038802 x 10^9 kg-m^2/s^2 = (6.6260687 x 10^-34 kg-m^2/s)
(2.6944002 x 10^25 m^3/s^3)/(6.6723641 x 10^-11 m^3/kg-s^2)
(5.4563026 x 10^-8 kg)
4.9038802 x 10^9 kg-m^2/s^2 = 4.9038802 x 10^9 kg-m^2/s^2
[rsu 3.9 x 10^-8]

E=h(Gd)^1/2
4.9038802 x 10^9 kg-m^2/s^2 = (6.6260687 x 10^-34 kg-m^2/s)
[(6.6723641 x 10^-11 m^3/kg-s^2)(8.2089591 x 10^95 kg/m^3)]^1/2
4.9038802 x 10^9 kg-m^2/s^2 = 4.9038802 x 10^9 kg-m^2/s^2
[rsu 3.9 x 10^-8]

G=c^3/mv
6.6723641 x 10^-11 m^3/kg-s^2 = (2.6944002 x 10^25 m^3/s^3)/
(5.4563026 x 10^-8 kg)(7.4008894 x 10^42 /s)
6.6723641 x 10^-11 m^3/kg-s^2 = 6.6723641 x 10^-11 m^3/kg-s^2
[rsu 3.9 x 10^-8]

G =wc^4/E
6.6723641 x 10^-11 m^3/kg-s^2 = (4.0507625 x 10^-35 m)
(8.0776087 x 10^33 m^4/s^4)/(4.9038802 x 10^9 kg-m^2/s^2)
6.6723641 x 10^-11 m^3/kg-s^2 = 6.6723641 x 10^-11 m^3/kg-s^2
[rsu 3.9 x 10^-8]

G=c^4/F
6.6723641 x 10^-11 m^3/kg-s^2 = (8.0776087 x 10^33 m^4/s^4)/
(1.2106066 x 10^44 kg-m/s^2)
6.6723641 x 10^-11 m^3/kg-s^2 = 6.6723641 x 10^-11 m^3/kg-s^2
[rsu 3.9 x 10^-8]

G=c^5/P
6.6723641 x 10^-11 m^3/kg-s^2 = (2.4216061 x 10^42 m^5/s^5)/
(3.6293075 x 10^52 kg-m^2/s^3)
6.6723641 x 10^-11 m^3/kg-s^2 = 6.6723641 x 10^-11 m^3/kg-s^2
[rsu 3.9 x 10^-8]

etc. (shortened to conserve bandwidth)

http://physics.nist.gov/cuu/Constants/
(1998 values shown, working on 2002)

Because it was recorded by the geophysical surveys, and it is known from literature, Exodus’ 114cm,45in x 69cm,27in x 69cm,27in four-winged gold ark (Rev's 'throne') and Ezekiel's four iron (ferromagnetic) wheels are currently located under the Stonehenge builders' rejected Heelstone, centered below the four beasts above it, surrounded by the 24 four elder(s) species of fossils (Carboniferous) around it, and the millions of species of younger fossils (Cretaceous) below it. Furthermore, 100m (328ft) east-southeast (E-SE) of Heelstone, at Stonehenge Mound, it was recorded by the geophysical surveys, and it is known from literature, Exodus' 229cm,90in x 229cm,90in x 137cm,54in brasen altar containing Exodus' 37-40 balance of artefacts (gold table, gold altar, etc.) are currently located inside Stonehenge Mound (Carboniferous), centered below its apex, surrounded by the ~32.5 tons of bituminous coal species of fossils (Carboniferous) around it, and the millions of species of younger fossils (Cretaceous) below it.

It is true magnetic reversals are ongoing processes, however the quoted theory, one of many, is slightly flawed. All such theories will be tested by the EHAML-WANT (English Heritage, Ancient Monuments Laboratory - Wessex Archaeology, National Trust) 1) Gold Ark Experiment, to be conducted shortly. The EHAML-WANT 1) Gold Ark [with balance 1) brasen altar, 2) gold table, 3) gold altar] Experiment will trigger the next polar flip, such flip lasting less than 1hr,60min in time, beginning with decreasing candelas 36hr,2160min before exhumation, and ending with increasing candelas 36hr,2160min after exhumation, of EHAML-WANT 1) Gold Ark, throughout the universe of many. It is true this is a wildcat prospect http://www.freewebs.com/garrydenke but the exploration geophysics is completed and it is time to commence 'mining' operations. Garry W. Denke, Geologist/Geophysicist, Denoco Inc. of Texas, Wildcat Station, P.O. Box 866488, Plano, Texas 75086-6488 USA (972) 422-8268 Office, (972) 423-6337 Fax, (940) 521-1667 Mobile

Graviton triggers the polar flip VegasRonin. Watch (time).

[VegasRonin]

Man! Methinks I'll need the combined knowledge of Prez and Laz to decipher your post.

[RavenWhitefang]

Anybuddy got a map, cuz I think im in the same boat with VR here..... :confused:

[Garry Denke]

Anybuddy got a map, cuz I think im in the same boat with VR here..... :confused:

Graviton is waiting on EHAML-WANT to dig, and waiting, and waiting, and waiting...

:bye:

[ThunderStruck64]

Ok..................... :chopper:

[DarkAce]

You're gonna have to explain in lamens term what the hell you're exactly talking about Garry:P

[RavenWhitefang]

/me ~blink blink~
em.....

[WoOp_De_DoO]

The photo from the top of the thread looks fake . Under the rocks head it is realy dark like there hiding something was there. I think that photo is fake.

[Garry Denke]

Rev 4's Lion head Calf head Man face (clockwise) Eagle wings (centering)
Stonehenge Heelstone Sculpture

http://adsl-63-195-87-212.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net/~dev/England/part1/th.aDSC00162.JPG
. . . . . . :amaz: . . . . . .
. . . . Gold Ark . . . .

http://www.freewebs.com/garrydenke

[ThunderStruck64]

Rev 4's Lion head Calf head Man face (clockwise) Eagle wings (centering) Stonehenge Heelstone Sculpture

It took 5 long mins to download the piccy and all I can see is a rock which looks remarkably like the close up of a gigantic spud.


Experiment will trigger the next polar flip

Which experiment? :confused: :alcoholic

[Garry Denke]

It took 5 long mins to download the piccy and all I can see is a rock which looks remarkably like the close up of a gigantic spud.
Which experiment? :confused: :alcoholic

Sorry, ThunderStruck. The coming polar flip experiment.

****Okay, here's the question: if the henges, like Stonehenge, were merely failed coal mining sites, then why were the stones, which to everyone's understanding are quite large, placed in such a way as to be aligned with the solstices and equinoxes?****

http://rbcm1.rbcm.gov.bc.ca/mh_papers/images/img05s.jpg

Lighting has always been a problem in mining operations. Maximum length of workday lighting engineering. Tall henge banks and stones blocked lighting if arranged any other way. Miners' days started at first light, and ended at last light, in the Stone Age.

[Dilandau]

It would be great if you could make a detailed exhibit page with little text and sharp (not neccessarily big) pictures, that explains the idea step by step. One big block of text just blocks awareness.

[Garry Denke]

The Wisdom Isms...

Geomagnetism
Uniformitarianism
Paleomagnetism

Isaac Newton, Benjamin Franklin, Adjustment 2002
http://physics.nist.gov/cuu/Constants/index.html

The Seven Graviton Values 1998

1) mass... (hc/G)^1/2 = 5.4563026(39) x 10^-8 kg
2) length... (hG/c^3)^1/2 = 4.0507625(38) x 10^-35 m
3) time... (hG/c^5)^1/2 = 1.3511889(41) x 10^-43 s
4) current... e/(hG/c^5)^1/2 = 1.1857530(90) x 10^24 A
5) temperature... (hc^5/G)^1/2/k = 3.5518626(82) x 10^32 K
6) substance... M/(hc/G)^1/2 = 1.6605387(31) x 10^-27 kmol
7) intensity... (hG/c^5)^1/2/sr = 1.9720204(06) x 10^-45 cd

The Two Graviton Angles 1998

1) solid angle... steradiant = 6.8517999(97) x 10^1 sr
2) plane angle... radiant = 1.3703599(97) x 10^2 rad

The Universe of Graviton 1998

001) irradiance constant i. = 4.5211591(52) x 10-122 s^3/kg
002) radiance constant i.= 3.0978078(26) x 10-120 s^3-sr/kg
003) radiant volume constant = 1.3554094(15) x 10^-113 m-s^2/kg
004) measurement volume = 6.6467654(65) x 10^-104 m^3
005) graviton volume constant = 1.2181812(31) x 10^-96 m^3/kg
006) luminous efficacy = 3.7229937(53) x 10^-96 cd-sr-s^3/kg-m^2
007) electric current volume = 1.3838190(49) x 10^-93 m^2/A
008) luminous energy = 1.8257115(55) x 10^-86 cd-sr-s
009) electric charge volume = 4.1485851(42) x 10^-85 m^3/A-s
010) molar volume = 4.0027765(33) x 10^-77 m^3/kmol
011) moment of inertia = 8.9530708(38) x 10^-77 kg-m^2
012) graviton fluidity = 1.0031235(26) x 10^-70 m-s/kg
013) measurement area = 1.6408677(14) x 10^-69 m^2
014) electric moment = 6.4900363(91) x 10^-54 A-s-m
015) graviton capacitance = 5.234567901... x 10^-48 A^2-s^4/kg-m^2
016) magnetic moment = 1.9456639(62) x 10^-45 A-m^2
017) luminous intensity = 1.9720204(06) x 10^-45 cd
018) graviton frequency i. = 1.3511889(41) x 10^-43 s
019) luminous flux = 1.3511889(41) x 10^-43 cd-sr
020) graviton moment = 2.2102186(33) x 10^-42 kg-m
021) inductance constant = 3.4877980(18) x 10^-39 kg-m^2/A^2-s^2
022) absorption-emission = 2.4763819(58) x 10^-36 s/kg
023) graviton wavelength = 4.0507625(38) x 10^-35 m
024) Planck constant = 6.6260687(65) x 10^-34 kg-m^2/s
025) relative expansion = 2.8154241(58) x 10^-33 /K
026) electric resistivity = 1.0456155(41) x 10^-30 kg-m^3/A^2-s^3
027) unified substance = 1.6605387(31) x 10^-27 kmol
028) kinematic viscosity = 1.2143880(58) x 10^-26 m^2/s
029) inverse electric current = 8.4334589(42) x 10^-25 /A
030) Boltzmann constant= 1.3806502(93) x 10^-23 kg-m^2/s^2-K
031) thermal resistance = 9.7866124(96) x 10^-21 s^3-K/kg-m^2
032) graviton molality = 3.0433405(93) x 10^-20 kmol/kg
033) elementary charge = 1.6021764(62) x 10^-19 A-s
034) primary radiation = 5.9552136(16) x 10^-17 kg-m^4/s^3
035) specific heat = 2.5303770(42) x 10^-16 m^2/s^2-K
036) magnetic flux q. = 2.0678336(42) x 10^-15 kg-m^2-sr/A-s^2-rad
037) magnetic flux = 4.1356672(77) x 10^-15 kg-m^2/A-s^2
038) electric permittivity = 1.2922425(96) x 10^-13 A^2-s^4/kg-m^3
039) magnetic exposure = 2.9363775(58) x 10^-12 A-s/kg
040) electric constant = 8.854187817... x 10^-12 A^2-s^4-sr/kg-m^3
041) magnetic pole strength = 4.8032041(96) x 10^-11 A-m
042) Newton constant = 6.6723641(43) x 10^-11 m^3/kg-s^2
043) density of states = 2.0392015(07) x 10^-10 s^2/kg-m^2
044) S-B primary constant = 1.3897143(30) x 10^-9 kg/s^3-K^4
045) radiant distribution constant = 3.335640952... x 10^-9 s/m
046) graviton mass constant = 5.4563026(39) x 10^-8 kg
047) molar Planck constant = 3.9903126(87) x 10^-7 kg-m^2/s-kmol
048) magnetic constant = 1.256637061... x 10^-6 kg-m/A^2-s^2-sr
049) electric conductance = 3.8740458(43) x 10^-5 A^2-s^3/kg-m^2
050) conductance q. = 7.7480916(72) x 10^-5 A^2-s^3-rad/kg-m^2-sr
051) magnetic permeability = 8.6102258(15) x 10^-5 kg-m/A^2-s^2
052) fine-structure constant = 7.2973525(36) x 10^-3 /rad
053) second radiation constant = 1.4387752(29) x 10^-2 m-K
054) dielectric constant = 1.4594705(05) x 10^-2 /sr
055) gravitational momentum = 1.6357583(80) x 10^1 kg-m/s
056) relative permeability = 6.8517999(97) x 10^1 sr
057) inverse fine-structure = 1.3703599(97) x 10^2 rad
058) impedance of vacuum = 3.767303134… x 10^2 kg-m^2/A^2-s^3-sr
059) molar gas constant = 8.3144720(88) x 10^3 kg-m^2/s^2-kmol-K
060) spin angle constant = 9.3894326(23) x 10^3 sr-rad
061) i. conductance q. = 1.2906403(83) x 10^4 kg-m^2-sr/A^2-s^3-rad
062) von Klitzing constant = 2.5812807(61) x 10^4 kg-m^2/A^2-s^3
063) inverse gravitational mass = 1.8327429(14) x 10^7 /kg
064) Faraday constant = 9.6485341(30) x 10^7 A-s/kmol
065) speed of light in vacuum = 2.99792458 x 10^8 m/s
066) graviton energy constant = 4.9038802(52) x 10^9 kg-m^2/s^2
067) Josephson primary = 2.4179894(88) x 10^14 A-s^2/kg-m^2
068) Josephson q. = 4.8359789(67) x 10^14 A-s^2-rad/kg-m^2-sr
069) electric displacement = 3.9552465(66) x 10^15 A-s/m
070) absorbed dose = 8.987551787… x 10^16 m^2/s^2
071) luminous density = 2.7467669(26) x 10^17 cd-sr-s/m^3
072) gravity displacement = 4.4930470(15) x 10^18 kg-s/m^2
073) molar mass constant = 3.2858629(17) x 10^19 kg/kmol
074) magnetic potential = 1.0209601(87) x 10^20 kg-m/A-s^2
075) thermal conductance = 1.0218040(21) x 10^20 kg-m^2/s^3-K
076) electric current constant = 1.1857530(90) x 10^24 A
077) luminance constant = 1.2018155(94) x 10^24 cd/m^2
078) luminous flux density = 8.2346000(82) x 10^25 cd-sr/m^2
079) Avogadro constant = 6.0221419(79) x 10^26 /kmol
080) gravitational field = 1.3469816(08) x 10^27 kg/m
081) electric potential = 3.0607616(38) x 10^28 kg-m^2/A-s^3
082) electric conductivity = 9.5637446(19) x 10^29 A^2-s^3/kg-m^3
083) Celcius temperature = 3.5518626(82) x 10^32 K
084) graviton wave number = 2.4686709(99) x 10^34 /m
085) mass flow rate constant = 4.0381492(72) x 10^35 kg/s
086) molar energy = 2.9531863(13) x 10^36 kg-m^2/s^2-kmol
087) surface concentration = 1.0119881(80) x 10^42 kmol/m^2
088) graviton frequency = 7.4008894(66) x 10^42 /s
089) superforce constant = 1.2106066(96) x 10^44 kg-m/s^2
090) luminous intensity i. = 5.0709414(41) x 10^44 /cd
091) angular velocity = 1.0141882(87) x 10^45 rad/s
092) electric flux density = 9.7642024(91) x 10^49 A-s/m^2
093) radiant intensity = 5.2968673(52) x 10^50 kg-m^2/s^3-sr
094) graviton field strength = 2.2187308(44) x 10^51 m/s^2
095) superpower constant = 3.6293075(70) x 10^52 kg-m^2/s^3
096) magnetic flux density = 2.5204148(03) x 10^54 kg/A-s^2
097) thermal conductivity = 2.5224979(53) x 10^54 kg-m/s^3-K
098) magnetic field strength = 2.9272342(65) x 10^58 A/m
099) absorbed dose rate = 6.6515877(33) x 10^59 m^2/s^3
100) graviton surface density = 3.3252544(33) x 10^61 kg/m^2
101) electric field strength = 7.5560134(90) x 10^62 kg-m/A-s^3
102) measurement area i. = 6.0943364(99) x 10^68 /m^2
103) dynamic viscosity = 9.9688619(97) x 10^69 kg/m-s
104) molar concentration = 2.4982658(70) x 10^76 kmol/m^3
105) surface tension constant= 2.9885896(41) x 10^78 kg/s^2
106) electric charge density = 2.4104603(51) x 10^84 A-s/m^3
107) angular acceleration = 7.5058954(07) x 10^87 rad/s^2
108) thermal transfer = 6.2272175(40) x 10^88 kg/s^3-K
109) electric current density = 7.2263783(36) x 10^92 A/m^2
110) luminous efficacy i. = 2.6860104(16) x 10^95 kg-m^2/cd-sr-s^3
111) graviton density constant = 8.2089591(81) x 10^95 kg/m^3
112) measurement density = 1.5044911(77) x 10^103 /m^3
113) radiant density constant = 7.3778445(74) x 10^112 kg/m-s^2
114) radiance constant = 3.2280892(03) x 10^119 kg/s^3-sr
115) irradiance constant = 2.2118221(59) x 10^121 kg/s^3
etc. 9^9 (387,420,489) combinations/equations

(shortened to conserve bandwidth)

i. is inverse, q. is quantum

[mysticalzoe]

when is this Ark excavation day? What does all of this stuff mean? please in english. Thanks! :D

Jessica

[VegasRonin]

You are not alone Jessica. None of us have figured this one out. :ohmy:

[Defiant Noquisi]

I dunno, but it looks like a turtles head, looking towards the sky.

Garry or whatever your name is since the real guy is dead, you started this post and several people have asked questions regarding what you have posted. Im in the same boat. You also posted a link which does nothing (since there is little on it) to explain your post except route us to an MSN chat group. Is your purpose to confuse us so we will go to the group seeking explanation?

I am not a mathmetician so the math does not explain anything to me. I am also not a scientist, I know virtually nothing about physics or experiments or pretty much anything you have posted regarding this other than Stonehenge is a bunch of standing rocks in a circle that had some religious significance to people long ago, and that you can quote poetry from the 1700's by William Blake asking the question was Jesus ever in England.

Excuse me for coming off as ignorant but if you want to prove and/or explain something about this you are going to have to do so in a manner that all can understand, not just people who can think on the level of that kind of information. Otherwise, why post it and then not answer peoples requests for more information in a way they (as well as myself) can understand it?

[Marajadex]

I have re-read this entire thread...
I think...
That the poster Garry Denke is trying to say...

1.) There is a school of thought that the Arc of the Covenant is buried under Stonehenge. Just as there is a school of thought that it is in Tunisa or Ethiopia.

2.) The EHAML-WANT (English Heritage, Ancient Monuments Laboratory - Wessex Archaeology, National Trust) will dig it out when ever they are good and ready to.

3.) Ah-la Indiana Jones movie... There will be some type of force released that will cause a pole reversal.

The rest seems like a lot of general physics, chemistry and astronomy info.

That is just my take on the info here...
Take it or leave it...
It is just my humble opinion.
:toast:

[VegasRonin]

I got that much also Marajadex. The rest is gibberish to me.

[Marajadex]

Thanks VR... It was all I could make out. Glad to know others see the same little bit of info. The rest looks like a glossary from a variety of science text books. Just as hard to read and no hope of understanding. :D

[Defiant Noquisi]

Thanks Marjadex. I kinda got that too but considering how much stuff it was buried in that I couldnt understand I wanted to make sure.

[Marajadex]

I have done a little and I mean little looking into this Gary Denke dude. If you put the name into google you get 7,950 listings. Checking into some of the lisitngs they are links to other boards where this poster has done the same thing as here. Posts reams of eronious information and no response to specific questions. Some boards call this a "Spam and Run" tactic.

Here is just a little of what I found:
http://www.iidb.org/vbb/showthread.php?t=86566
http://www.wiccaforums.com/index.php?showtopic=1286

[Defiant Noquisi]

That's kinda what I thought when I looked at the website he posted and there was nothing on it. I guess we can call this one a "dead thread".

[Marajadex]

That was my Idea too. No need to beat a non-existant dead horse. Glad you agree Defiant Noquisi.
:toast:

[Garry Denke]

I have re-read this entire thread...
I think...
That the poster Garry Denke is trying to say...

1.) There is a school of thought that the Arc of the Covenant is buried under Stonehenge. Just as there is a school of thought that it is in Tunisa or Ethiopia.

2.) The EHAML-WANT (English Heritage, Ancient Monuments Laboratory - Wessex Archaeology, National Trust) will dig it out when ever they are good and ready to.

3.) Ah-la Indiana Jones movie... There will be some type of force released that will cause a pole reversal.

The rest seems like a lot of general physics, chemistry and astronomy info.

That is just my take on the info here...
Take it or leave it...
It is just my humble opinion.
:toast:

superforce = c^4/G
c = superpower/superforce
superpower = c^5/G

http://perso.club-internet.fr/molaire1/e_superforce.html

We were there gathered and hoping to show you all of the Carboniferous rocks, circling/over the artifacts. No worries though, all of the Welsh born Stonehenge rocks are to be moved back to Wales:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/wales/3830547.stm

Instead we visited the good Doctor Robyn Lewis who staked the official claim on behalf of all fellow druids, all bards and all the Welsh compatriots. Archdruid of Wales made no claim to our artifacts:

http://dsc.discovery.com/news/briefs/20040614/stonehenge.html

Discoveries sparked it. Glacial transport disproven. So much for the Judd, Kellaway, Hawkins, Williams-Thorpe, et al, glacial transport. Thomas, Atkinson, Greene, Scourse, et al, would be proud.

http://www.oup.com/us/catalog/general/subject/?view=usa&sf=toc&ci=0197261744

Here is the good Doctor's requested list of Welsh rocks that need to go back to Wales. They are in the way of the excavation of our gold, silver, brass, iron, wood, and stone artifacts anyway. Archdruid of Wales, the good Doctor Robyn Lewis, has offered to pay for their removal, as agreed, making this a low cost excavation:

http://groups.msn.com/ArkArchaeology/shoebox.msnw

1) Stonehenge Whitestones - The oldest limestone sedimentary rocks at Stonehenge are the Early Carboniferous (Mississippian) Period, Arundian Age, calcium carbonates. The Early Carboniferous (Mississippian) Period limestone sedimentary rocks comprise the first (1st) Welsh construction material used by the Stonehenge builders from Wales. This material is approximately 340 million years old. These stones are called High Tor (Birnbeck) Limestone Formation rocks. They are Welsh and need to go back to Wales.

2) Stonehenge Bluestones - The volcanic rocks (oldest geologically) at Stonehenge are the Ordovician Period intrusive igneous diabases (dolerites), and extrusive igneous felsites (rhyolites) and tuffs (basic). The Ordovician Period igneous rocks comprise the second (2nd) Welsh construction material used by the Stonehenge builders from Wales. This material is approximately 470 million years old. These stones are called Ordovician Volcanic rocks. They are Welsh and need to go back to Wales.

3) Stonehenge Coshestons - The oldest sandstone sedimentary rocks at Stonehenge are the Silurian-Devonian Period micaceous sandstones. The Silurian-Devonian Period sandstone sedimentary rocks comprise the third (3rd) Welsh construction material used by the Stonehenge builders from Wales. This material is approximately 417 million years old. These stones are called Old Red Sandstone Formation rocks. They are Welsh and need to go back to Wales.

4) Stonehenge Gritstones - The sandstone grit, conglomerate, limestone, shale, and coal sedimentary rocks at Stonehenge are the Late Carboniferous (Pennsylvanian), Namurian Age, silicates, calcium carbonates, and carbons. The Late Carboniferous (Pennsylvanian) Period sandstone grit, conglomerate, limestone, shale, and coal sedimentary rocks comprise the fourth (4th) Welsh construction material used by the Stonehenge builders from Wales. This material is approximately 320 million years old. These stones are called Millstone Grit Formation rocks. They are Welsh and need to go back to Wales.

5) Stonehenge Coalstones - The bituminous coal sedimentary rocks at Stonehenge are the Late Carboniferous (Pennsylvanian) Period, Westphalian Age, carbons. The Late Carboniferous (Pennsylvanian) Period bituminous coal sedimentary rocks comprise the fifth (5th) Welsh construction material used by the Stonehenge builders from Wales. This material is approximately 310 million years old. These stones are called Crosskeys Coal Measures rocks. They are Welsh and need to go back to Wales.

Here Here to the good Doctor, the Archdruid of Wales!

Garry Denke

ps. See that Marajadex, this redig is financed.

[Defiant Noquisi]

Could you please tell me why something of such historical significance should be torn down and shipped away? Aside from the tourist attraction that it is, of what purpose would it be to dismantle it? It's just me expressing my opinion but I think it unneccesary that with the technology of today, that it would be torn down for artifact extraction and not be able to keep it intact.

[Marajadex]

Don't even waste your time on this thread. It should be closed. This dude is a spammer apparently. He doesn't answer any questions asked and just posts reams of extraneous information. When it is even readable it makes little to no cense to the reader. I agree with you there is no reason to tear down such a historic monument. I looked into other boards where he has posted the same info. The replys are about the same as here, lots of questions and no answers.

[Defiant Noquisi]

Yeah, I have asked questions and not one answer. Ill go as far as adding "poser" to the spammer title. Posting reams of highly educated stuff does not make one intelligent, all it proves is that you can copy/paste.

Weird, I just got an email from someone inviting me to join a super volcanos list. I see culling for members isnt just reserved for this clown. :boxer:

[Garry Denke]

Could you please tell me why something of such historical significance should be torn down and shipped away?
Rocks are Welsh and it belongs in Wales.



Aside from the tourist attraction that it is, of what purpose would it be to dismantle it?
Tourists can go to Wales to see it again.



It's just me expressing my opinion but I think it unneccesary that with the technology of today, that it would be torn down for artifact extraction and not be able to keep it intact.
It is only an "failed coal exploration site".

Garry Denke

[Garry Denke]

Don't even waste your time on this thread. It should be closed. This dude is a spammer apparently. He doesn't answer any questions asked and just posts reams of extraneous information. When it is even readable it makes little to no cense to the reader. I agree with you there is no reason to tear down such a historic monument. I looked into other boards where he has posted the same info. The replys are about the same as here, lots of questions and no answers.
:guill:

Garry Denke

[Defiant Noquisi]

Rocks are Welsh and it belongs in Wales. That almost makes it sound like it was stolen and built where it is now.


Tourists can go to Wales to see it again. True


It is only an "failed coal exploration site". Ive heard of alot of theories about what it could be but never this one. If there is so much question about it, how was it figured out as failed coal exploration? Ive also heard that it was recently reopened as a tourist attraction and my brother went to see it.

Sorry about the name calling but weve been posting questions to you and all you replied with was stuff that the majority of us would never begin to understand. I got the impression that you were just trolling for members and ignoring our queries. Thank you for finally responding.

[Garry Denke]

If there is so much question about it, how was it figured out as failed coal exploration?
It has been known for several decades now. Figuring became apparent with exposed coal field mapping. The raw truth is not very mysterious or attractive. Quite boring calling the henges failed dry holes really. But that is what they were in their beginning. Much later they did become gathering sites. And even later religious ceremonial monuments of sorts. But the fact remains their first function were as coal failures.



Ive also heard that it was recently reopened as a tourist attraction and my brother went to see it. Sorry about the name calling but weve been posting questions to you and all you replied with was stuff that the majority of us would never begin to understand. I got the impression that you were just trolling for members and ignoring our queries. Thank you for finally responding.
No worries, I am used to it. Not many people enjoy hearing about this. I even wonder why I ever went into science. Sometimes it really sucks. O well, I am old, and tired. Good night Defiant Noquisi.

:toast:

[Defiant Noquisi]

Science does excite me but considering I have the brain function of a two year old in comparison to what you posted, I could never attain the level of knowledge in my lifetime that I would need to understand it. I dont know that much about the stones and most of what I could find that was understandable to me was on the "touristy" level. Thats why I asked of more info from you.

Will you be a part of the dig or are you someone that is interested in its happenings?

[Garry Denke]

Science does excite me but considering I have the brain function of a two year old in comparison to what you posted, I could never attain the level of knowledge in my lifetime that I would need to understand it. I dont know that much about the stones and most of what I could find that was understandable to me was on the "touristy" level. Thats why I asked of more info from you.

Will you be a part of the dig or are you someone that is interested in its happenings?

Ramrod only. Interested yes. Take care.

[DontBeAfraid]

due to the odd way garry kenke posts and how his posts are usually almost unrelated to what is asked of him I can almost dare to venture the guess that garry denky is a smart bot with automated responses to certain phrases and key words.

[MacRasta]

due to the odd way garry kenke posts and how his posts are usually almost unrelated to what is asked of him I can almost dare to venture the guess that garry denky is a smart bot with automated responses to certain phrases and key words.

Idem Dito, green sprunkles on starwars double cheese flatstones.

Mac :alcoholic

[Garry Denke]

due to the odd way garry kenke posts and how his posts are usually almost unrelated to what is asked of him I can almost dare to venture the guess that garry denky is a smart bot with automated responses to certain phrases and key words.
These rocks get to stay, DontBeAfraid, so what is the big deal?

1) Stonehenge White Chalk - The outcrop sedimentary rocks at Stonehenge are the Late Cretaceous Period, Santonian Age, calcium carbonates. The Late Cretaceous Period outcrop sedimentary rocks comprise the first (1st) English construction material used by the Stonehenge builders of England. This material is approximately 85 million years old. These stones are called Seaford Chalk Formation rocks. They are English and belong in England.

2) Stonehenge Sarsens - The youngest sandstone sedimentary rocks at Stonehenge are the Oligocene-Miocene (Tertiary) Period silicates. The Oligocene-Miocene Period sandstone sedimentary rocks comprise the second (2nd) English construction material used by the Stonehenge builders of England. This material is approximately 24 million years old. These stones are called Reading Formation rocks. They are English and belong in England.

Unless of course Marlborough wants the Sarsens back;
Save and Except: the Heelstone of Hampshire County.

Stonehenge Heelstone Sculpture

In 22 separate excavations, for which the detailed records are published, a total of "over 11,500 stone fragments were recorded" at Stonehenge (PROCEEDINGS AT THE BRITISH ACADEMY . 92, SCIENCE AND STONEHENGE, Cunliffe & Renfrew, 1997, pages 258-9), representing all of its different lithologies. Approximately 4,000 sarsen chips, including "a total of 3,760 sarsen fragments", and "sarsen sand from the area", excavated by Lieutenant-Colonel William Hawley (REPORT ON THE EXCAVATIONS AT STONEHENGE DURING THE SEASON OF 1923, W. Hawley, 1925, pages 21-50), from a single location within ten (10) meters of the Heelstone, in the Avenue between the Heelstone and the Slaughter Stone, "do strongly suggest that a stone was either dressed or broken up in the vicinity" (STONEHENGE, Cleal, Walker, Montague, 1995, page 290), in front of the Heelstone carvings.

In 1975, Arizona State University (ASU) GLG 324 Petrology-Petrography class analised the Cainozoic Reading Formation sarsen samples provided by Professor Richard Atkinson from the London Basin, the Hampshire Basin, and from each of the sarsens at Stonehenge. The ASU 1975 GLG 324 Petrology-Petrography class determined through optical mineralogy and geochemical analysis that the source area of the Palaeogene-Oligocene age heavy mineralogy Heelstone was from the Hampshire Basin located to the south of Stonehenge, and all of the rest of the Neogene-Miocene age lighter mineralogy sarsens at Stonehenge were from the London Basin to the north of Stonehenge. It was from this first detailed analysis by ASU in 1975, and the subsequent works of H. Howard 1982; A petrological study of the rock specimens from excavations at Stonehenge, 1979-1980, in M.W. Pitts, 1982, 104-24, where the Heelstone carvings fragment chips from its sculpture were determined. In short, the piles of sarsen chips and sarsen sand at the sarsen Heelstone, "do strongly suggest that a stone was either dressed or broken up in the vicinity" (STONEHENGE, Cleal, Walker, Montague, 1995, page 290), in front of the Heelstone Lion head, Calf head, Man face (clockwise), and Eagle wings (centering) carvings:

http://www.freewebs.com/garrydenke

Bibliography:

REPORT ON THE EXCAVATIONS AT STONEHENGE DURING THE SEASON OF 1923
William Hawley
Antiq. J., 5
1925
21-50
Hele Stone, sarsen chips,
and sarsen sand

STONEHENGE
R.J.C. Atkinson
PENGUIN BOOKS
in association with Hamish Hamilton
1956
ISBN 0140136460
INDEX 221
Carvings, prehistoric,
43-7, 91-3, 139-40, 178-9, 208-9
Heel Stone,
29-30,68-9, 70, 76, 105, 173, 203

STONEHENGE in its landscape; Twentieth-century excavations
Rosamund M J Cleal, K E Walker, and R Montague with major contributions by
Michael J Allen, Alex Bayliss, C Bronk Ramsey, Linda Coleman, Julie Gardiner,
P A Harding, Rupert Housley, Andrew J Lawson, Gerry McCormac, Jacqueline I McKinley,
Andrew Payne, Robert G Scaife, Dale Serjeantson, and Geoff Wainwright
ENGLISH HERITAGE
1995
ARCHAEOLOGICAL REPORT 10
ISBN 1850746052
INDEX 603, 608
carvings, prehistoric
30-3, Plate 7.2
Heelstone (Stone 96),
25, 26, 166, 269, 270, 271, 272

PROCEEDINGS OF THE BRITISH ACADEMY . 92
Science and Stonehenge
Edited by
BARRY CUNLIFFE & COLIN RENFREW
Published for THE BRITISH ACADEMY
by OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS
1997
ISBN 0197261744
INDEX 351, 355
carvings, prehistoric
5, 29, 35, 150, 338
Heelstone (Stone 96)
15, 16, 28, 155

HENGEWORLD
Mike Pitts
C
CENTURY . LONDON
2000
ISBN 0712679545
INDEX 402, 403
Stonehenge
carvings
8, 26, 265-6, 296-7, 27, 266
Heelstone
8, 96, 135, 139, 145-50, 154, 229, 266, 275, 7, 138, 146, 230

[DontBeAfraid]

See? there it goes again.

[VegasRonin]

Think it'll evolve? :D

[MacRasta]

Mr GD,

2 + 2 = 4

or

2 + 2 = 4 + taxes?

Mac R

[stewey]

yeah, this thread is a waste of server space. i fail to see what those formulas have to do with anything, as noah's ark doesn't exist (never did, its impossible scientifically).

[VegasRonin]

yeah, this thread is a waste of server space. i fail to see what those formulas have to do with anything, as noah's ark doesn't exist (never did, its impossible scientifically). LOL! LOL! Ark of the Covenant Stewey!! You've seen Indiana Jones right?

[Garry Denke]

Mr GD,
2 + 2 = 4
or
2 + 2 = 4 + taxes?
Mac R
Hello Mac-R,

+ taxes + taxes + taxes ... :pcangry:

G-D

[MacRasta]

Hello Mac-R,

+ taxes + taxes + taxes ... :pcangry:

G-D

I see now,

finally you answer in lamens term what you are talking about :

We're all doomed!

Mac

[Garry Denke]

I see now,

finally you answer in lamens term what you are talking about :

We're all doomed!

Mac
http://www.sciforums.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=2971&stc=1

:pray:

[Wraith13]

Ok, while scientists have noticed a weakening in the magnetic field over the past decade or so, the actual polar reversal will take more than a day or so. I mean short of God's Hand intervening, it takes a thousand years or so to complete magnetic pole reversal. So I am going to stick with scientists on this one.

[Garry Denke]

Ok, while scientists have noticed a weakening in the magnetic field over the past decade or so, the actual polar reversal will take more than a day or so. I mean short of God's Hand intervening, it takes a thousand years or so to complete magnetic pole reversal. So I am going to stick with scientists on this one.
Many Thanks!

:abduct:

Garry Denke