PDA

View Full Version : The System Worked... ?



Reef Badlaw
Dec 28th, 2009, 10:30 AM
Secretary Napolitano said the homeland security-system regarding air-travel worked, Sunday on CNN.

I wondered what system she was referring-to... plain, old-fashioned 'good luck' ? -Or typical Al Qaeda ineptitude, when solelly motivated by zealous expediency?
Then, today, she flip-flopped her comment;

http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/73729-napolitano-system-did-not-work-in-this-instance

Leave it to an Obama appointee to politicize everything, while treating incidents like Flight-253 and Fort Hood as ordinary 'crimes'. -No wonder the Trial Lawyers Lobby adores the current Congress and Administration so much.

JenaS62
Dec 28th, 2009, 10:51 AM
Secretary Napolitano said the homeland security-system regarding air-travel worked, Sunday on CNN.

I wondered what system she was referring-to... plain, old-fashioned 'good luck' ? -Or typical Al Qaeda ineptitude, when solelly motivated by zealous expediency?
Then, today, she flip-flopped her comment;

http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/73729-napolitano-system-did-not-work-in-this-instance

Leave it to an Obama appointee to politicize everything, while treating incidents like Flight-253 and Fort Hood as ordinary 'crimes'. -No wonder the Trial Lawyers Lobby adores the current Congress and Administration so much.


It worked only if the bomber and the passengers worked for homeland security. What a joke.

pico
Dec 28th, 2009, 11:39 AM
Yeah.... a great system in action. Thank goodness Uncle Sam is keeping watch.

PanamaGuy
Dec 28th, 2009, 2:26 PM
yea, i agree. there was a breakdown in the system...

MaximumPain
Dec 28th, 2009, 2:34 PM
So what would you all have done differently so that something like this would not occur?

lycanox
Dec 28th, 2009, 3:10 PM
If we go back to the free situation ten years ago with no lists or flight precautions and such. People must also accept that they are going to lose a plane and civilians to terrorist attacks once in a while.

If you want to adapt to the new situation created by the terror war and stop such attacks. You need strict security and reduced privacy to foil those plans.

You cant have a cake and eat it too in this matter.

olddragon
Dec 28th, 2009, 3:19 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Deje2EM-KY&feature=player_embedded

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kwYxIzdh9N4&feature=related


People must also accept that they are going to lose a plane and civilians to terrorist attacks once in a while.

You need strict security and reduced privacy to foil those plans.

You cant have a cake and eat it too in this matter.

I agree Lyca and I would add one more thing.
These are not crimes. They do not require police.

This war and requires soldiers.

MaximumPain
Dec 28th, 2009, 3:20 PM
Agreed.

One thing is that no fly list is some 500,000 names and growing. There are people on there like Cat Stevens and Ted Kennedy (I doubt he will be blowing up any planes soon). They need to pear that down to a workable number. They need to place those scanners to view under peoples cloths if your to modest then I guess you don't fly tough luck.

MaximumPain
Dec 28th, 2009, 3:39 PM
And what country should we invade with our soldiers OD? Do you have any solutions we can afford or is your answer always a gun?

James Random
Dec 28th, 2009, 5:42 PM
And what country should we invade with our soldiers OD? Do you have any solutions we can afford or is your answer always a gun?

Oh i dunno. Throw a dart at the map of the middle east. Wherever it lands..invade. Alternatively send out scouts to search for sources like oil and stuff - then invade.

MaximumPain
Dec 28th, 2009, 5:51 PM
Oh i dunno. Throw a dart at the map of the middle east. Wherever it lands..invade. Alternatively send out scouts to search for sources like oil and stuff - then invade.


Heh or we could just nuke the whole site from orbit... its the only way to be sure. That would solve the Israel problem as well.

pico
Dec 28th, 2009, 6:12 PM
In any free society, you cannot have 100% protection. But she claimed the system worked, and has now said it did not. She is a fucking idiot to think the system worked in her original statement.

James Random
Dec 28th, 2009, 6:28 PM
Heh or we could just nuke the whole site from orbit... its the only way to be sure. That would solve the Israel problem as well.

You didn't use the Official sarcasm font

Surprisingly enough i discovered [font=official sarcasm] actually works! :P:humpin:

MaximumPain
Dec 28th, 2009, 6:29 PM
In any free society, you cannot have 100% protection. But she claimed the system worked, and has now said it did not. She is a fucking idiot to think the system worked in her original statement.

Im betting you didn't listen to her original statement Pico or Jena or Reef or Panama hell Im not sure OD even listened to it or if you did you heard what you wanted and not what was said.
Listen to the first video OD posted. She says "Once the incident occurred the system worked" she did not claim that the system worked before the incident occurred. Your hatred of the current administration clouds your minds.

I'm not saying there aren't any problems with the current administration but you are over reacting trying to score points against Obama and its making you skip logic.

MaximumPain
Dec 28th, 2009, 6:30 PM
You didn't use the Official sarcasm font

Surprisingly enough i discovered [font=official sarcasm] actually works! :P:humpin:

Wow that is really cool thanks for sharing James. :2thumbs:

James Random
Dec 28th, 2009, 6:37 PM
Wow that is really cool thanks for sharing James. :2thumbs:

You forgot the font again :probe:

MaximumPain
Dec 28th, 2009, 6:40 PM
You forgot the font again :probe:

No it was a real thanks... really it was you have to do more then call me a cunt to earn my lifelong hatred. Hell its only a forum after all. :bye:

James Random
Dec 28th, 2009, 7:02 PM
In any free society, you cannot have 100% protection. But she claimed the system worked, and has now said it did not. She is a fucking idiot to think the system worked in her original statement.


Sure it can. But it's a joint effort. You can't sit in a 'free society' and then complain when The System doesn't stop the plane flying into the building. Because 100% protection is a joint effort. It requires everyone to be vigilant. This is why people get robbed in the street. Because they walk around with their minds full of trivialities, looking at the pavement and hands in their pockets.

A little more self-awareness in people would go a long way to cutting down on many of the crimes in the world that exist. It's the same with terrorism. People are always so preoccupied about the 1000000000000 things they HAVE to do today, either for holiday or on business, that even if they see a suspicious person at the airport they don't register it.

It is possible to get 100% protection, but the only person who can bring that about for you personally is you. The only people that can bring it about for nations, are the peoples of those nations paying attention to the world rather than the bullshit that fills their minds currently.

Tired Old Man
Dec 28th, 2009, 7:04 PM
The so called system will never work as long as government agency don't share information and act on it.
But then if they act on it someone will scream police state.
A simple answer would be to profile people. But that would be wrong.....

MaximumPain
Dec 28th, 2009, 7:34 PM
The so called system will never work as long as government agency don't share information and act on it.
But then if they act on it someone will scream police state.
A simple answer would be to profile people. But that would be wrong.....

A nice conundrum we are in eh? We cant trust the government but they are all that protects us both from the terrorists and from the greedy corporations. I guess were screwed then! :probe:

Freddy
Dec 28th, 2009, 7:48 PM
More than a month prior to the attempted attack the US was warned about the bomber by his own family.

"...U.S. counterterror agencies received the information on Nov. 20, a day after it was provided by the father, but it was not enough to revoke the visa."

So, if his daddy thinks he is dangerous, why was he not taken seriously? His daddy made three separate warnings about his Muslim extremist son.

http://www.winnipegfreepress.com/world/breakingnews/80234577.html

I am really surprised that a plane has not been brought down by a wacko, Muslim bomber. With security like this below it is simlpy a miracle. Then the bomber is allowed to board a plane in Amsterdam for the US where the three anti-bomb/explosive search procedures are not used. One, being a low tech physical search of a known Muslim extremist.


"The problem was that Amsterdam had no such airport "puffer" machines, the devices that blow air onto a passenger to collect and analyze residues, would probably have detected the powder, as would bomb-sniffing dogs or a hands-on search using a swab, but unfortunately none were used."

http://www.examiner.com/x-3678-Baltimore-Conservative-Examiner~y2009m12d28-How-did-a-bomber-slip-onto-a-plane-to-Detroit

Tired Old Man
Dec 28th, 2009, 7:57 PM
A nice conundrum we are in eh? We cant trust the government but they are all that protects us both from the terrorists and from the greedy corporations. I guess were screwed then! :probe:

I feel that way at times Max. But we do have one thing....people.
You, me and everyone else. We find corruption in government and scream about it. And sometimes change it.
We go after corrupt corporations and make them change. People make a difference. Governments only do what we allow them to do.

JenaS62
Dec 28th, 2009, 8:01 PM
A simple answer would be to profile people.


Exactly. If I were in an all black country that had been terrorized by strictly white people, I would sure as hell understand if I were profiled. I would encourage them to check me - just to be sure I was not the one with the bomb. Hell when the police are looking for a serial killer, they tend to profile middle aged white men. Does anyone flinch over that?

We waste time checking little old ladies and 3 year olds in strollers. And god help you if you have a hip replacement - never mind that you're 90 years old -you might be a terrorist.

I know that this is not the popular answer with most people but it's the most logical and in this case - logic should prevail.

**edit - I should add that by profile, I mean younger men - all of them. You can't really profile for Muslims because they come in all sizes, colors and shapes. You profile young men - you stand a better chance of catching a terrorist.

DontBeAfraid
Dec 28th, 2009, 8:23 PM
It seems that it wasnt OUR system that failed but Amsterdam's...

Nu Kua
Dec 28th, 2009, 8:28 PM
^^^^^^^^^ due to all the pot they smoke, to be sure.

Reef Badlaw
Dec 28th, 2009, 8:36 PM
Im betting you didn't listen to her original statement Pico or Jena or Reef or Panama hell Im not sure OD even listened to it or if you did you heard what you wanted and not what was said.
Listen to the first video OD posted. She says "Once the incident occurred the system worked" she did not claim that the system worked before the incident occurred.

There's no doubt she inferred that it 'worked' before, during, after...

I heard it. CNN, Fox, and ABC replayed the comment Sunday afternoon into Sunday night, as various rattletraps speculated on what she meant. -With the agreed premise that the White House wasn't telling the press how the system had worked...

Then, with Monday's 180, I naturally added Napolitano's Summer Email-snafu, warning that returning military-veterans should be considered as potential terrorists... finalizing my opinion that Napolitano's a publicity-sodden sock-puppet. What I'm betting, is that her resignation-strategy is being crafted by Administration-staffers as I type this.

Freddy
Dec 28th, 2009, 9:35 PM
There's no doubt she inferred that it 'worked' before, during, after...

I heard it. CNN, Fox, and ABC replayed the comment Sunday afternoon into Sunday night, as various rattletraps speculated on what she meant. -With the agreed premise that the White House wasn't telling the press how the system had worked...

Then, with Monday's 180, I naturally added Napolitano's Summer Email-snafu, warning that returning military-veterans should be considered as potential terrorists... finalizing my opinion that Napolitano's a publicity-sodden sock-puppet. What I'm betting, is that her resignation-strategy is being crafted by Administration-staffers as I type this.
One can only hope!

MaximumPain
Dec 28th, 2009, 11:42 PM
There's no doubt she inferred that it 'worked' before, during, after...

Its the first clip posted by OD???? Your hearing what you want not whats said! I seriously don't know how you get that out of what she said? :nono:

Once the incident occurred does not mean before the incident occurred. Shes talking about the reaction not the prevention.

.

Reef Badlaw
Dec 29th, 2009, 12:49 PM
My brain can't relate to her inferring that the system worked after... After 300 people were saved by a brave, resourceful resident of Holland? Unless you mean the system of handcuffing the 'criminal', reading him miranda-rights, then whisking him away to a hospital to recieve the finest medical-care The Great Satan can provide.

Kerry opted for flip-flopping, before he opted against it, etc.
Napolitano symbolizes why ppl hate politicians.

MaximumPain
Dec 29th, 2009, 2:50 PM
~ Oh just never mind:wallbash:

olddragon
Dec 29th, 2009, 3:55 PM
http://i246.photobucket.com/albums/gg103/o1ddragon/smilies/evilguyoncomputer.gif

Because of the recent attempted bombings,
all passengers and flight crews,
will be required to disrobe,
as they enter airport property.

It is hoped that this new security measure,
will not simply cut down on such attempts but,
completely eliminate them in the future.

Since bombing materials have been hidden in shoes, luggage,
and now in underwear.
The only full proof way of preventing such attacks is full nudity.

While this may cause some self consciousness, at first,
it is the safety of all that is paramount. :thumbs:

Once the flying public,
has become accustom to the new regulation forbidding clothing.
It is felt that this could be expanded into more everyday types of travel.
Such as driving to the grocery store, or hardware store.

In the end it could also save the consumer money,
the need to purchase clothes that can only be worn in the home,
simply will not be needed.


:cool14:

MaximumPain
Dec 29th, 2009, 4:10 PM
http://i246.photobucket.com/albums/gg103/o1ddragon/smilies/evilguyoncomputer.gif

Because of the recent attempted bombings,
all passengers and flight crews,
will be required to disrobe,
as they enter airport property.

It is hoped that this new security measure,
will not simply cut down on such attempts but,
completely eliminate them in the future.

Since bombing materials have been hidden in shoes, luggage,
and now in underwear.
The only full proof way of preventing such attacks is full nudity.

While this may cause some self consciousness, at first,
it is the safety of all that is paramount. :thumbs:

Once the flying public,
has become accustom to the new regulation forbidding clothing.
It is felt that this could be expanded into more everyday types of travel.
Such as driving to the grocery store, or hardware store.

In the end it could also save the consumer money,
the need to purchase clothes that can only be worn in the home,
simply will not be needed.


:cool14:

Muhahahahahaha::)):

Maybe this is not so good given our obesity epidemic. This will take some getting used to.

olddragon
Dec 29th, 2009, 4:14 PM
Muhahahahahaha::)):

Maybe this is not so good given our obesity epidemic. This will take some getting used to.

What better incentive to shape up.:doh:

Traveler
Dec 29th, 2009, 4:32 PM
Like I pointed out on other threads nudism will become common.

But I do not think that it will catch on well up here in Canada in the winter.

Cartesiantheater
Dec 29th, 2009, 4:58 PM
http://i246.photobucket.com/albums/gg103/o1ddragon/smilies/evilguyoncomputer.gif

Because of the recent attempted bombings,
all passengers and flight crews,
will be required to disrobe,
as they enter airport property.

It is hoped that this new security measure,
will not simply cut down on such attempts but,
completely eliminate them in the future.

Since bombing materials have been hidden in shoes, luggage,
and now in underwear.
The only full proof way of preventing such attacks is full nudity.

While this may cause some self consciousness, at first,
it is the safety of all that is paramount. :thumbs:

Once the flying public,
has become accustom to the new regulation forbidding clothing.
It is felt that this could be expanded into more everyday types of travel.
Such as driving to the grocery store, or hardware store.

In the end it could also save the consumer money,
the need to purchase clothes that can only be worn in the home,
simply will not be needed.


:cool14:

Now the explosives will be firmly inserted into the anus. Nice work. :doh:

olddragon
Dec 29th, 2009, 5:57 PM
Now the explosives will be firmly inserted into the anus. Nice work. :doh:

Gives a whole new meaning, to blowing your ass up ! http://i246.photobucket.com/albums/gg103/o1ddragon/smilies/nuke-1.gif