PDA

View Full Version : Waffles



Conservative Front
Jul 30th, 2004, 10:44 PM
So,the Dem fist-fest is over,thank the Lord.Seems they spent plenty of time on the "Bush Misled America" rant.Lurch(Kerry) himself,hit that point.

Well let's look at one of Skerry's comments that shows just how bad a waffler he is.

"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction. ... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real." - Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003

I particularly like the line,"He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to his continued deceit",yes it's true of Saddam,but it's also true of John Boy himself.

Now I wonder who could be misleading America?Hmmm....

dutchie
Jul 31st, 2004, 2:45 AM
The whole political circus - left AND right - is one big pack of liars. These are people that make MONEY from their lies. So - making money from your hobby - what better job can there be?!?

Don't give me that crap about Bush being holy and never telling lies.. They ALL do that. Period.

playmaker88
Jul 31st, 2004, 7:25 AM
The day that a politician gives a simple, straight-forward answer to a simple, straight-forward question I will start to take politicians seriously.

Marajadex
Jul 31st, 2004, 3:19 PM
Second, without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime. We all know the litany of his offenses.

He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation. He miscalculated an eight-year war with Iran. He miscalculated the invasion of Kuwait. He miscalculated America's response to that act of naked aggression. He miscalculated the result of setting oil rigs on fire. He miscalculated the impact of sending scuds into Israel and trying to assassinate an American President. He miscalculated his own military strength. He miscalculated the Arab world's response to his misconduct. And now he is miscalculating America's response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction.

That is why the world, through the United Nations Security Council, has spoken with one voice, demanding that Iraq disclose its weapons programs and disarm.
So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real, but it is not new. It has been with us since the end of the Persian Gulf War.

Regrettably the current Administration failed to take the opportunity to bring this issue to the United Nations two years ago or immediately after September 11th, when we had such unity of spirit with our allies. When it finally did speak, it was with hasty war talk instead of a coherent call for Iraqi disarmament. And that made it possible for other Arab regimes to shift their focus to the perils of war for themselves rather than keeping the focus on the perils posed by Saddam's deadly arsenal. Indeed, for a time, the Administration's unilateralism, in effect, elevated Saddam in the eyes of his neighbors to a level he never would have achieved on his own, undermining America's standing with most of the coalition partners which had joined us in repelling the invasion of Kuwait a decade ago.

In U.N. Security Council Resolution 1441, the United Nations has now affirmed that Saddam Hussein must disarm or face the most serious consequences. Let me make it clear that the burden is resoundingly on Saddam Hussein to live up to the ceasefire agreement he signed and make clear to the world how he disposed of weapons he previously admitted to possessing. But the burden is also clearly on the Bush Administration to do the hard work of building a broad coalition at the U.N. and the necessary work of educating America about the rationale for war.

As I have said frequently and repeat here today, the United States should never go to war because it wants to, the United States should go to war because we have to. And we don't have to until we have exhausted the remedies available, built legitimacy and earned the consent of the American people, absent, of course, an imminent threat requiring urgent action.

The Administration must pass this test. I believe they must take the time to do the hard work of diplomacy. They must do a better job of making their case to the American people and to the world.

http://www.theleftcoaster.com/archives/000953.html

Conservative Front
Aug 1st, 2004, 1:04 AM
The RIGHT is going to be a little more truthful and is going to keep a little more money in my pocket. Quite frankly i'm sick of the government stealing my hard earned money for FICA and Medicaid. I don't want to fund Kerry's Social Programs I don't want to fund the environment the government needs to learn to do less with less and the only way you're going to get that is with a Right-leaning government.

(quite frankly I don't mind if they make money off my hobby hopefully someday Ill be making money off my hobby I plan on going to college for 8-12 years for it Political Science Major (or Ph.D) and Constitional Law Major)

---end response to dutchie---

And that proves what Mara? That he waffled on Iraq? plus you're going to be hard pressed to find a nonpartisan review of what JOhn KErry said. I've watched most of his speeches and I've watched the Primary Debates and the DNC speech so i'm quite informed on what he said.

---end response to Mara---

Emerald_Dragon
Aug 1st, 2004, 2:55 PM
>the government needs to learn to do less with less and the only way you're going to get
>that is with a Right-leaning government.


so you support the war but don't want to pay for it? do you know what the Department of Homeland Security is?
how much money do you think they're spending on it? the war? do you believe the "Right"-wing majority we have now, is spending less?

maybe you _should_ go to college for poli-sci, maybe then you'll get a clue.

but then again, maybe you won't. when i graduated, i was staunchly a republican believing as you do, but now that I know better, its difficult to pass it on to someone who is not ready for it. I wasn't, straight out of college. I doubt you will either.

Defiant Noquisi
Aug 1st, 2004, 4:05 PM
Blah blah blah blah blah blah blah. Repeat as needed because thats all this and every other Kerry post by CF is. More of the same. One day he may post something interesting and informative instead of repeating virtually the same thing everytime. :indec: