*Nonpartisan question to Bush backers*

[C-Style]

When Bush gets his second term, do you think we will fight another war with a new enemy before he's done?

Such as Iraq, Syria, N. Korea (whoever).

EDIT*

Oooopsss...replace Iraq, with Iran.

[Moishe3rd]

When Bush gets his second term, do you think we will fight another war with a new enemy before he's done?

Such as Iraq, Syria, N. Korea (whoever).

I suspect not Iraq. We are already there.
Probably not Syria, unless they attack first.
Definitely not North Korea. They are totally irrelevent.
Possibly Iran. Iran is threatening to attack the United States.
That might bring Syria into it.
I think if either Bush or Kerry is elected, that either one would go to war to proctect the interests of the United States. I suspect that Kerry would be quicker on the trigger, but I don't think we'll ever find that out.

[VegasRonin]

I think we'll be fighting wars pretty much non-stop, regardless of who's in office. Until there's a one world Govt., there is still a lot of assimilating that needs to be done. :devsmoke:

[C-Style]

Here's my guess.

When Bush gets his second term, (2005) we will begin bringing back troops from Asia to "home." Then in a couple weeks, they'll be in Iraq and Afghanistan. Then a terrorist attack will occur in America and Israel at (nearly) the same time.

Bush will declare that Iran has attacked us. Israel will do the same to their people.

Israel and US will separately attack Iran at the same time.

[Marajadex]

C-Style...
Remember there is a lot more involved in an election than just voting. For one thing there is the strange british royalty connection, which Bush and Kerry are both related to british royalty. Kerry has a closer relationship and that has in the past been a factor in the election of a president. I don't know how but it has been. Then there is the Buildeburgers, who have said they prefer to see John Edwards as president. That is a rather ominous statement... We could be closer to that one world government, that VegasRonin was speaking about, than we all think. Then again this is all conspiracy theory and conjecture and could mean nothing at all.

Just like they say in the Movie Alien vs Predator...
No matter who wins we lose. :dead:

[C-Style]

Maraj,

I agree with you. What I'm saying is, the next war will play right into their hands.

What kind of body count can we expect from a Bush adminstration with no re-election to worry about.

Keep in mind, I think John Kerry is a dangerous person, and will not be a good President either.

I think with these two choices for the future of America, and the world, really, we are all in some deep shit.

And these people (NWO) have really put some of the final pieces into place.

What's our recourse?

http://www.infowars.com/print/Secret_societies/american_dictator.htm

watch that quick vid

[C-Style]

Another thing Maraj,

you said the thing about Edwards being the favored choice of the Bilderbergers...

Well, Edwards is a member of their organization and attended the meeting this year.

So if JFK was to win, he better have some good secret service.

[Marajadex]

Oh my goodness I am about to quote myself...


Then there is the Buildeburgers, who have said they prefer to see John Edwards as president. That is a rather ominous statement...

We all know about puppet presidencys... Take a look at the current admin. He dosn't have to be bumped off for Edwards to be in charge...

[C-Style]

Excellent point. Bush 41 openly spoke about the New World Order. I think we'll be a lot closer to it by the end of this decade. The "War on Terror" provides the perfect reason to get all the sheeple to give up their rights.

Next thing you know...

[substand]

any attack on iran would be solely to help the brewing revolution there along. our current position squeezes them like a pimple, and IMO, it has 2 aims:

1) deter attacks from them, knowing that the religious elite will easily be deposed if such an attack occurs.

2) encourage the growing rebellion, knowing that we can help if we are so inclined because of our position.

[humanhybrid]

any attack on iran would be solely to help the brewing revolution there along. our current position squeezes them like a pimple, and IMO, it has 2 aims: Lovely way with death and suffering or should we call a dermatoligist?


1) deter attacks from them, knowing that the religious elite will easily be deposed if such an attack occurs. You are talking about Christians or the Zionists?


2) encourage the growing rebellion, knowing that we can help if we are so inclined because of our position. Now I know you must be describing those 100 to 200 thousand protesters in New York

[Donsun]

Thats a good question to everyone right and left. I like to think of myself in the middle but who the hell knows what that is anymore. I believe it does not matter who is elected the US is going to go after someone else shortly after the election. Bush could go more nuts than kerry because he does'nt have to worry about reelection but either way my guess is IRAN. :uh:

[substand]

You are talking about Christians or the Zionists?
Now I know you must be describing those 100 to 200 thousand protesters in New York

You know who I am talking about. And if you had anything but slogans and dim wit you might also see that Iran is in fact ruled by a religious elite and that many of the people aren't happy about it, and have no recourse to do anything about it. I used to think the Iranian people had ahelluva constitution that could be a model for freedom in the Middle East, and I thought they were happy with it.

Then I did some research, with my first part being to study their constitution, laws, and some news papers to try and understand how their government worked. From this, I concluded that the government was actually pretty moderate and quite nice.

My second part was a series of questions to actual Iranians who live there as well as others who had emigrated, which basically had 3 purposes. 1) Ask Iranians how they see their government as working (its mechanics) 2) how they view their role in it and its functions and outputs, and 3) how they would improve it, if indeed they would.

This 2nd part greatly opened my eyes to the situation and I even had one of my interview participants point out the sections in the constitution that I had not understood that give the vali-e-faqh his overwhelming powers, and which basically serve to ensure that any elections in Iran are simply parades- even when "reformers" were elected to government in majority, they could not do anything because of the power of the religious elite.

I suppose you were not interested in learning any of that though. You'd prefer to think that the Christians and Jews which are given seats in the Iranian Majlis are secretly plotting to take over the country.

[Moishe3rd]

"That doesn't make any sense..."
President George W. Bush

You know, I hop around to different forums. Hither, thither and yon.
And it never really occurred to me before where this forum is...
This is Armageddon Online. Damn. Armageddon Online. Where the main points of view are conspiracies.... Damn

Well, back when I was a boy, I mapped out the conspiracies too. I proved the Duponts and the Rockefellers (and the Bildeburgers) and Tyrant all killed JFK.
And were controlling the world.
And controlled the United States.
And were OUTSIDE YOUR DOOR!!!!!!!

Yep.

Then I got older.

Hate to tell ya this folks, but Evil is just not that smart.
Conspiracies at the base of them are all pretty stupid.
No one is in control.

But, ocaissionally, a few good men try and do the right thing.
Vote for Bush. The world will be a safer place.

[humanhybrid]

Hate to tell ya this folks, but Evil is just not that smart.
Conspiracies at the base of them are all pretty stupid.
No one is in control.

But, ocaissionally, a few good men try and do the right thing.
Vote for Bush. The world will be a safer place. Why would he hate to tell us this. WHY? I dont hate telling anybody this, that conspiracies do exist at what ever age one is and occasionally there are a few bad men who do the wrong things to other humans on a grand scale. VOTE FOR KERRY. The world is not a safe place now and has not been since the Sr. and son Bush took office and rattled a hornets nest. good day!

[Thor]

I guess I'd have to say we would go into Iran and depose that leadership as well. The current GOP point of view would be they are definitely a thorn to be plucked out. I would even find it safe to say plans are already being made to march in there next. Can't see Syria as a threat that needs to be dealt with first. From all the stories I've read recently, Saudi Arabia's royal family is controlled rather than doing the controlling, and Al Quaeda has infiltrated anyway, so that country may be on the chopping block as well.

[mickydoolittle]

Vote for Bush. The world will be a safer place.

This was all that should have been written for the entire thread.

Kudos Moishe3rd.

[DontBeAfraid]

Indeed, pissing off all your neighbors is the perfect way to secure your home......