Why second tower to be "hit" was first to be pulled worldwide exclusive VIDEO

[MattMarriott]

Why second WTC tower to be "hit" was first WTC to be pulled - explained worldwide first here - VIDEO

The bombs detonated to simulate the second impact didn't go as good as with the first "impact".
That's why the second tower to be "hit" was the first to be pulled.

This time it isn't a video hoaxed by CNN in real-time or released "short after" being hoaxed.
It is what the illuminati media until now kept away from the public: what hundreds with video and cameras got.
http://youtube.com/watch?v=ExrVgioIXvk

In the case of the second tower: some of the bombs used to suggest the wings, started to mix with the explosives set to implode it.
That's why the tower had to be pulled immediately.

Revealed worldwide first time by Matt Marriott, also the first to explain
- the WTC "impacts", by suggestion technique, with the CNN plane, added with software, disappearing behind the burning tower just before the second "impact";
- the dead "passengers", a suggestion created by murdering previously Barbara Olson;
- the pre-condition for the operation "mass slaughter in Lower Manhattan": the murder of Massood in northern Afghanistan, September 9, 2001.

[stewey]

Why second WTC tower to be "hit" was first WTC to be pulled - explained worldwide first here - VIDEO

The bombs detonated to simulate the second impact didn't go as good as with the first "impact".
That's why the second tower to be "hit" was the first to be pulled.

This time it isn't a video hoaxed by CNN in real-time or released "short after" being hoaxed.
It is what the illuminati media until now kept away from the public: what hundreds with video and cameras got.
http://youtube.com/watch?v=ExrVgioIXvk

In the case of the second tower: some of the bombs used to suggest the wings, started to mix with the explosives set to implode it.
That's why the tower had to be pulled immediately.

Revealed worldwide first time by Matt Marriott, also the first to explain
- the WTC "impacts", by suggestion technique, with the CNN plane, added with software, disappearing behind the burning tower just before the second "impact";
- the dead "passengers", a suggestion created by murdering previously Barbara Olson;
- the pre-condition for the operation "mass slaughter in Lower Manhattan": the murder of Massood in northern Afghanistan, September 9, 2001.

I don't get what you are trying to say... You are saying that an object never hit the second tower?

[MattMarriott]

Yes. There were NO real planes. Just one CNN plane "live" and all you want processed into video and photos afterwards.

[bbbv3.5]

LMFAO! And what about the 1,000,000 people who saw the plane hit the buildings?

[Skynet12]

Maybe it was a hologram!

[loganosborne]

Yes. There were NO real planes. Just one CNN plane "live" and all you want processed into video and photos afterwards.
Suppose all the people in New York on the day didnt see anything then. Of cause they did.

[lycanox]

This is absolute bullshit.

Why would America go through all this trouble while they simply could have taken one of those remote controlled test airplanes.

[Powerdog30]

Yeah, I get the feeling you talk out your backside on this one. Try again, sparky...
:2thumbs:

[Cartesiantheater]

- the dead "passengers", a suggestion created by murdering previously Barbara Olson;

Yeah, I don't quite get what you're trying to say here... Are you saying that no passengers died? Are their families in on it, too? Just "acting" like they lost a family member? Or was it all some sort of mass hypnosis? Maybe using a magical talisman and ass-feathers?


- the pre-condition for the operation "mass slaughter in Lower Manhattan": the murder of Massood in northern Afghanistan, September 9, 2001.
And I definitely don't know what you're trying to say here. A little clarification, please?
:abduct:

[krakatoa]

The second tower hit, did fall before the 1st one hit, because it was hit at a much lower level, it was twice or so the weight. So it went down first. The buildings falling on themselves, was because they where built that way in case of Earthquake, even if there less chance of big earthquake in NY, it is gonna happen in the future and be strong enough to damages buildings.They talked about on Dateline Last Sunday.(about earthquake on dateline, not about wtc and earthquake) before the movie 10.5 apocalypse, the sequel. C.

[Cartesiantheater]

The second tower hit, did fall before the 1st one hit, because it was hit at a much lower level, it was twice or so the weight. So it went down first. The buildings falling on themselves, was because they where built that way in case of Earthquake, even if there less chance of big earthquake in NY, it is gonna happen in the future and be strong enough to damages buildings.They talked about on Dateline Last Sunday.(about earthquake on dateline, not about wtc and earthquake) before the movie 10.5 apocalypse, the sequel. C.
Didn't you hear? Dateline is in on the conspiracy... They are lying about how buildings are built, using magical onions potent in telepathy and cardiology to deceive you... :abduct:

[krakatoa]

Didn't you hear? Dateline is in on the conspiracy... They are lying about how buildings are built, using magical onions potent in telepathy and cardiology to deceive you... :abduct:

sorry I didn't mean that Dateline talk about the towers, dateline was only talking about a possibilily of an earthquake in NY. they never said nothing about WTC. But all more recent buildings are built to withstand some of the earthquakes, if they dont, they falled on themself.

[jeffweeder]

Found this on another forum

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6579629754876766189&q=new+world+order

[Skynet12]

Well........

[loganosborne]

Can someone tell me what the video is like video dont work on my computer sadly.

[Cartesiantheater]

sorry I didn't mean that Dateline talk about the towers, dateline was only talking about a possibilily of an earthquake in NY. they never said nothing about WTC. But all more recent buildings are built to withstand some of the earthquakes, if they dont, they falled on themself.

Just as long as we're clear that I was NOT trying to make fun of you. I was making fun of conspiracy theorists in general, especially MattMartiott for talking gibberish. What I was saying (in gest) is that Dateline lied about buildings falling in on themselves in an attempt to boost the conspiracy, since they are in on it (along with all who oppose the "truth seekers").:abduct:

[jeffweeder]

The footage is of a plane flying around the wtc, with a mysterious object being seen,moving very very fast. Then the footage shows the 2nd plane hitting the wtc, and another mysterious object, moving away ,on a trajectory different to that of the rubble. I'M only on dial up and it was painfully slow to watch, need BB.

[krakatoa]

Just as long as we're clear that I was NOT trying to make fun of you. I was making fun of conspiracy theorists in general, especially MattMartiott for talking gibberish. What I was saying (in gest) is that Dateline lied about buildings falling in on themselves in an attempt to boost the conspiracy, since they are in on it (along with all who oppose the "truth seekers").:abduct:

Of Course we are clear on that one. that is why I tought about the WTC, falling on themselfe, I said it was ok because usually, buildings are built, whith earthquake, in mind, Dateline just made a report on Earthquaques in general sunday night, before 10.5 Apocalypse mini serie, And in the show, Scientist said that an earthquake, could happend in the future in NY. So from what new myself on that subjects Earthquake, I thought that these buildings, would have falled on themselfes if there was a earthquaque. So on 9/11 when I saw them falled on themselfe, I told to myself, they thought about earthquake when they builled them.

I am not for conspiracy theorys myself, but sometimes, I see a post, and it make me think it a little.

I dont believe in a lot of things, for exemple. When we see Pres. Bush in Irak, what is there to prove to me that he is really there, We see an army tent, with militiry personal, sitting on chair and listen to him. an cheers. This tent could be anywere in the world, including USA.
Tks for reading me. C. :2thumbs:

[MattMarriott]

Suppose all the people in New York on the day didnt see anything then. Of cause they did.

See 9/11 for dummies - The Five Basic Facts
http://forums.armageddononline.org/showthread.php?t=6559

In particular, about the praticability, despite thousands of eyewitnesses and millions watching TV:
http://forums.armageddononline.org/showthread.php?t=6689

[Cartesiantheater]

See 9/11 for dummies - The Five Basic Facts
http://forums.armageddononline.org/showthread.php?t=6559

In particular, about the praticability, despite thousands of eyewitnesses and millions watching TV:
http://forums.armageddononline.org/showthread.php?t=6689
Of course, you then proceed to provide no real evidence whatsoever to back up your claims! Besides, it wasn't the US government or the Illuminati who perpetrated the attack on the towers- it was the Alien who escaped from Roswell, New Mexico ridding on Nessie with a leprechaun firmly stuck up his butt. He got his revenge for being imprisoned and treated like a lab animal. And how do I know this? My invisible pink elephant with a magical pubic talisman glued to his arse told me.

And yes, I am making fun of you. But not because you are a conspiracy theorist. Now and Micahyah are also conspiracy theorists. But they actually provide compelling arguments and attempt to back up what they say with research, work, and at least marginal evidence. You're just pulling crap out of your ass.

And any evidence you do provide will be scrutinized. And of course, your theory is completely safe from falsification, which makes it unscientific BY DEFINITION. Here. Read this, if you've got the time:

from wikipedia: "Karl Popper argued that science is written as a set of falsifiable hypotheses; metaphysical or unscientific theories and claims are those which do not admit any possibility for falsification. Critics of conspiracy theories sometimes argue that many of them are not falsifiable and so cannot be scientific. This accusation is often accurate, and is a necessary consequence of the logical structure of certain kinds of conspiracy theories. These take the form of uncircumscribed existential statements, alleging the existence of some action or object without specifying the place or time at which it can be observed. Failure to observe the phenomenon can then always be the result of looking in the wrong place or looking at the wrong time — that is, having been duped by the conspiracy. This makes impossible any demonstration that the conspiracy does not exist."
:alien: :abduct: :alien:

[donniedarko]

Besides, it wasn't the US government or the Illuminati who perpetrated the attack on the towers- it was the Alien who escaped from Roswell, New Mexico ridding on Nessie with a leprechaun firmly stuck up his butt. He got his revenge for being imprisoned and treated like a lab animal. And how do I know this? My invisible pink elephant with a magical pubic talisman glued to his arse told me.


LMFAO!!!!!

*applaudes*

[lazserus]

Failure to observe the phenomenon can then always be the result of looking in the wrong place or looking at the wrong time — that is, having been duped by the conspiracy. This makes impossible any demonstration that the conspiracy does not exist.
I wonder if anyone actually caught that. It seems to me that a lot of conspiracy theorists use the purple elephant logic. Calling it logic is kind of an oxymoron, but anyway - The logic goes that person A can claim there is a purple elephant under the table. Person B says to prove it. Person A responds, "Well you can't prove that it's not there, thus the elephant exists!"

Just thinking of that makes baby Jesus cry.

[Demonskates]

jeff,cool vid man,now that is some pretty neat stuff.its far more convinceing than matts theory. :2thumbs:

[XSam Adams guyX]

jeff,cool vid man,now that is some pretty neat stuff :2thumbs:
i agree my friend........though some of the shit freaked me out a bit.......with the pope and stuff.....the upside-down cross was in the middle of view and none saw it exept for a few!!!.......these guys MUST expiriment with this stuff on people......its just like the too obvious IS obvious......the pope sucks anyway lol but very interesting video,none ive ever seen like it.have a good tomorrow people......oh and the thought that i do this sometimes makes me feel very uncomfortible..... :headbang: ...........uhhh i dunno why i would say this but...i saw a episode of DBZ today...... :52: oh and it could possibly be phototshop too.......POSSIBLY....