View Full Version : Israel plans for war with Iran and Syria
ryangt2
Sep 3rd, 2006, 8:52 PM
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2089-2340486,00.html go here if you want.Why is it now there seems to be problems with threats everyday Iran,afghanistan,Iraq and is anybody going to be able to sort this problem.Why should we be worried?Are we brainwashed by media or is this really going to happen before the end of the year.Iran is the main sponsor of terrorism,maybe we dont know what to do against the middle east and what a mess.Where do we go from here?
Smoke
Sep 4th, 2006, 12:38 AM
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2089-2340486,00.html go here if you want.Why is it now there seems to be problems with threats everyday Iran,afghanistan,Iraq and is anybody going to be able to sort this problem.Why should we be worried?Are we brainwashed by media or is this really going to happen before the end of the year.Iran is the main sponsor of terrorism,maybe we dont know what to do against the middle east and what a mess.Where do we go from here?
this is gonna be world war 3 with out a doubt. if that happens. will be so intence. i think isreal will get beat down.
loganosborne
Sep 4th, 2006, 1:04 AM
I don't see why Isreal need to attack either nation for the time being. Syria have no nucleur weapons, so I can't see how they are threat unless they are still supplying arms to hezbollah. Isreal just like America also have no proof that Iran are making nukes.
this is gonna be world war 3 with out a doubt. if that happens.
It could be a possibilty.
Justice
Sep 4th, 2006, 5:09 AM
America gives cluster bombs to Israel and Israel advances on to another country and uses these cluster bombs and yet the term terrorist is applied to the opposing forces.
Yes I think the Jewish people should be left in peace without all these mad Muslims being swarm to kill them from birth but I can understand why people are turning against the Jewish people whilst they are acting like this and who will blame radical groups for attacking America when all we get from the media is stuff trying to convince us that it is legitimate to attack nations that give weapons to others.
We can not have one rule for them and another rule for others.
America may bite off a lot more than it can chew if Russia and China backs Iran and then if they back out you will see Israel being left to defend itself and without it’s partner it will soon be overrun. I think they are bringing a lot of this on themselves
jeffweeder
Sep 4th, 2006, 5:11 AM
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2089-2340486,00.html go here if you want.Why is it now there seems to be problems with threats everyday Iran,afghanistan,Iraq and is anybody going to be able to sort this problem.Why should we be worried?Are we brainwashed by media or is this really going to happen before the end of the year.Iran is the main sponsor of terrorism,maybe we dont know what to do against the middle east and what a mess.Where do we go from here?
We probably wont have the chance to go anywhere..with the weapons that we possess. Dont forget, that when the ussr split up, so did its arsenal of weapons, and the break-up of it are mostly, if not all ISAMIC states. snowball effect is likely, as this involves religous extremism, like never before.
You asked if anyone is able to reconcile the parties involved, being JEW-MOSLEM- CHRISTIAN,-
Well, if they say that they have respect for their founding forefather, MAYBE they can look to him, as he is the same person, for all of them. ABRAHAM. May as well try and start here, having a sense of family
loganosborne
Sep 4th, 2006, 5:30 AM
We can not have one rule for them and another rule for others.
Good statement and I agree with it. If Isreal are aloud to have big powerful then so should the arab nations.
Nasik
Sep 4th, 2006, 11:37 AM
I like how Perle (who has absolutely no credibility whatsoever) says that if Israel had only attacked Syria then the war would have been over quicker.
That statement is so rife with BS its difficult to stomach - really Perle?
Right now we'd be on the verge of WWIII - instead of an unsteady, fragile ceasefire. If Israel attempts a strike (obviously with either US support or consent) then we are facing a global castastrophe.
When is this all going to end? When is this going to stop? How far do we have to go before we understand that war is not the answer? When everything is wasted?
skweeks
Sep 4th, 2006, 11:50 AM
I like how Perle (who has absolutely no credibility whatsoever) says that if Israel had only attacked Syria then the war would have been over quicker.
That statement is so rife with BS its difficult to stomach - really Perle?
Right now we'd be on the verge of WWIII - instead of an unsteady, fragile ceasefire. If Israel attempts a strike (obviously with either US support or consent) then we are facing a global castastrophe.
When is this all going to end? When is this going to stop? How far do we have to go before we understand that war is not the answer? When everything is wasted?
Unfortunately with all the religious fanaticism (all sides) there will only be more suffering for all peoples of the world.Each side thinks they are right,so the blood-bath will continue.
G.
Demonskates
Sep 4th, 2006, 2:23 PM
America gives cluster bombs to Israel and Israel advances on to another country and uses these cluster bombs and yet the term terrorist is applied to the opposing forces.
Yes I think the Jewish people should be left in peace without all these mad Muslims being swarm to kill them from birth but I can understand why people are turning against the Jewish people whilst they are acting like this and who will blame radical groups for attacking America when all we get from the media is stuff trying to convince us that it is legitimate to attack nations that give weapons to others.
We can not have one rule for them and another rule for others.
America may bite off a lot more than it can chew if Russia and China backs Iran and then if they back out you will see Israel being left to defend itself and without it’s partner it will soon be overrun. I think they are bringing a lot of this on themselves
But didnt you know,American policy concerning arms trade and nukes has always been,"Do as i say,not as do."LOL.
krakatoa
Sep 4th, 2006, 6:10 PM
I anderstand now, and i think all of you to, why there is less thread, and post, on armageddon and disaster, because there is much, going on in the world, especially due to the middle east situations, there is so much, trouble in that region, there is a lot to talk about. I never really felt that there would be a ww3, in the neir future, even if i was posting about it, i did believe it was gonna happened, but not to the point of being concern, that much. Since libanon, Isreal vs Hezbollah. I really felt that there could in deed be a ww3. I still sleep, at night, but i feel that this time, we are closer to it. How close, we can not know, that is why, that we listen to the news, and expressing our view about it here on armageddon on line. C. :prin:
ryangt2
Sep 4th, 2006, 8:33 PM
Spreading slowly like a cancer.What with global warming threat upon us what could be worse?.Have a read here http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/5312072.stm.I would think that we have other serious issues without a bloody war but thats human nature.The futures dull the futures gone.Okay let me wake up if its gonna happen its gonna happen its just get on with it as i have said before.worrying though that there are small attacks on innocent tourists near enough every day now and cannot get myself away from the tv.The worlds is in turmoil
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.1.6 Copyright © 2013 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.