View Full Version : is it fair to foster foreign children?
db99
Oct 16th, 2006, 12:27 PM
Madonna has been told she cannot foster a child form malawi becuase its against there law because she never lived there. But is it fiar to deprives this child of a new life and a new beggining where is will have a loving family and have friends. Even the father said he wants the child to go
loganosborne
Oct 16th, 2006, 12:32 PM
If the baby is offered a better life then I think it is fair.
db99
Oct 16th, 2006, 12:35 PM
The goverment are saying that it is against the rules but there mother is dead and the father is dying it does not deseve to be left homeless. There are reports that he/she is flying to amrica right now with one of madonnas body guards!
loganosborne
Oct 16th, 2006, 12:40 PM
there mother is dead and the father is dying it does not deseve to be left homeless.
Exactly, thats why it is fair. Theres already 1 dead and 1 people in the family dieing lets not make it a possible 3 dead by making the child homeless.
db99
Oct 16th, 2006, 12:43 PM
yea i agree he/she should get to USA now because they,ve got the big bodyguard with them!
loganosborne
Oct 16th, 2006, 12:51 PM
Heres a news article about it (http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/6056042.stm)
Perfectionist
Oct 16th, 2006, 3:57 PM
Can't help thinking this is gonna be the latest fad/fashion for all these bored and obsecenely rich celebrities ...... as for the baby, well it's better than winning the lottery !!
loganosborne
Oct 17th, 2006, 1:11 AM
Can't help thinking this is gonna be the latest fad/fashion for all these bored and obsecenely rich celebrities ......
Thats only a good thing for the children as you said it's better than winning the lottery for them.
Skynet12
Oct 17th, 2006, 2:37 AM
Can't help thinking this is gonna be the latest fad/fashion for all these bored and obsecenely rich celebrities ...... as for the baby, well it's better than winning the lottery !!
Ask me, sh'd have been better giving the village a couple of million instead o taking one back. And oh, yeah- disn't she already have about 72 kids?
db99
Oct 17th, 2006, 4:13 AM
Yes but at least try and give the child a better life it will be able to have an education like all of us:D
Chuna88
Oct 17th, 2006, 4:51 AM
Well, I think that they should let the child go, after his dad's dead because the father will want to see his child for a last time before going...
Skynet12
Oct 17th, 2006, 7:20 AM
Too true. I think she should leve her wallet behind and get the hell out.
loganosborne
Oct 17th, 2006, 10:12 AM
Ask me, sh'd have been better giving the village a couple of million instead o taking one back.
How does that hlp the kid? the mother is already dead and father about to die. The money would do no good the kid would become homeless still.
Perfectionist
Oct 17th, 2006, 11:11 AM
Very true ...... not only should she have adopted (a whole bunch of) kids ...... she should have left a portion of her $400 million dollar fortune there as well ...... that's if she actually gave a damn about those people ......
loganosborne
Oct 17th, 2006, 11:14 AM
she should have left a portion of her $400 million dollar fortune there as well ......
Yep I agree with that. :2thumbs:
db99
Oct 17th, 2006, 11:54 AM
yes i do think that is fair but will all the fatcat politicians and goverment take all the monay and therefore leaving the children that are homeless with little or none!
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.1.6 Copyright © 2013 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.