PDA

View Full Version : Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich Acknowledges Having Affair During Clinton Impeachment



Raptor Witness
Mar 9th, 2007, 7:19 AM
[Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich Acknowledges Having Affair During Clinton Impeachment] (http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,258001,00.html)

WASHINGTON — Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich was having an extramarital affair even as he led the charge against President Clinton over the Monica Lewinsky affair, he acknowledged in an interview with a conservative Christian group.

__________________________________________________ ______

Perfectionist
Mar 9th, 2007, 1:15 PM
What a slimy mofo !! :D .................

Raptor Witness
Mar 10th, 2007, 7:41 AM
There's nothing worse than the modern day Pharisees and Sadducees, who cannot even admit their own hypocrisy when it's so obvious to everyone else. Let the [lightning continue to strike] (http://forums.armageddononline.org/showpost.php?p=144375&postcount=1) them from every angle imaginable, until the smoke from their political corpse rises to such a height, that the plume can be seen from one state to another.


http://www.ktb.net/~billmeco/MinotaurSTP6.jpg

[Source Link] (http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.ktb.net/~billmeco/MinotaurSTP6.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.ktb.net/~billmeco/minotaurSTPR1.html&h=367&w=550&sz=29&hl=en&start=202&tbnid=Dlq4M-dvEixAKM:&tbnh=89&tbnw=133&prev=/images%3Fq%3Dsmoke%2Bplume%26start%3D200%26ndsp%3D 20%26svnum%3D10%26hl%3Den%26rls%3DDVFA,DVFA:1970--2,DVFA:en%26sa%3DN)

Abyssal_Worm
Mar 10th, 2007, 11:27 PM
I can't believe people actually believe the impeachment was about the issue of his affair and not about the issue of his lying about it while under oath in front of the supreme court.

Raptor Witness
Mar 11th, 2007, 1:01 PM
I can't believe people actually believe the impeachment was about the issue of his affair and not about the issue of his lying about it while under oath in front of the supreme court.
Who cares if he got a thousand bl*w jobs in the Oval Office? I don't care, nor do most of the American people. I don't want to know about it, NOR do most of the American people. Perhaps he lied under oath to protect his wife from more unnecessary pain? This was political payback for the Clarence Thomas hearings, which were also an unwarranted farce.

The great evil of this society is given to them through the mouthpiece of Satan, and the talking [idol image] (http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Revelation%2013:13-15;&version=31;) men worship the tongue of. The arena in Rome II is visible from every household, because of a miracle. Where is the condemnation of what can steal a man's soul, firstly? Where is the condemnation of the biggest lie of all? ["Not a word was spoken, the church bells all were broken."] (http://www.lyrics007.com/Don%20McLean%20Lyrics/American%20Pie%20Lyrics.html)


http://farm1.static.flickr.com/177/404072384_2a57556026_o.jpg
http://farm1.static.flickr.com/49/173325743_c6d2200eee.jpg

Abyssal_Worm
Mar 11th, 2007, 1:36 PM
I really didn't care what he did in the office. Heck, if he had come out and admitted to it before the hearings, I would have been fine with it. Instead, he lied while under oath. It is irrelevant what he lied about, the fact remains that he swore to tell the truth and nothing but the truth.


Perhaps he lied under oath to protect his wife from more unnecessary pain?

If that were his intentions, wouldn't he come out in the open by now and said so? Also, if he wanted to avoid hurting his wife, wouldn't he have thought twice about commiting adultry? No, he wan't thinking about her pain at all. Seriously, if you loved someone, would you do something you know is just going to hurt them?

Raptor Witness
Mar 11th, 2007, 5:06 PM
I really didn't care what he did in the office. Then why don't you defend the man for an unwarranted invasion of his privacy? It's just as bad as what the democrats did to Clarence Thomas. There's no common sense in Washington, which is why the people need
[a new form of representative government.] (http://forums.armageddononline.org/showthread.php?t=5676) These people don't represent us. It's a lie, and we all know it's a lie, but nobody is saying that we need to fix the Constitution, because the False Prophet(electronic media) supports the Beast.

When this thing begins to unravel, and that process has already begun, the people will long for true representation, because the evil now in place is set to openly cannibalize the population in mass. This house of cards is coming down, but not because of a little sex, lies, and videotape. It's coming down because the Creator is fed up with greater lies that are piled up to Heaven. Lies that have to do with the ["covenant of death."] (http://farm1.static.flickr.com/151/334811448_e1e3dcd31a.jpg)


[Isaiah 28:] (http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Isaiah%2028%20;&version=31;)

16 So this is what the Sovereign LORD says:
"See, I lay a stone in Zion,
a tested stone, a precious cornerstone for a sure foundation;
the one who trusts will never be dismayed.

17 I will make justice the measuring line
and righteousness [the plumb line] (http://forums.armageddononline.org/showpost.php?p=141496&postcount=138);
[hail] (http://forums.armageddononline.org/showpost.php?p=94911&postcount=3) will sweep away your refuge, the lie,
and water will overflow your hiding place.

18 Your [covenant with death] (http://forums.armageddononline.org/showpost.php?p=130786&postcount=12) will be annulled;
your agreement with the grave will not stand.
When the overwhelming scourge sweeps by,
you will be beaten down by it.

19 As often as it comes it will carry you away;
morning after morning, by day and by night,
it will sweep through."

The understanding of this message
will bring sheer [terror.] (http://forums.armageddononline.org/showpost.php?p=131079&postcount=34)