how the world should deal with iranian nuclear program

[dedanoe]

i think that the president of Iran is mainly concerned that he may end as victim of American international policy in the formally same way Saddam Husein did and thereof his nuclear arming is not with intention to conquer or strike against the entire world which certainly is unachievable but it is merely A legal defensive measure. on the other side Americans too fear that such an Atom armed inhabitant at the core of middle east may endanger the safety of primarily say, Israel the founder of Christianity and thereof they too out of fear only increase the tensions. the simplest possible solution is to turn this war game as childish as possible (gather all the errors from all the kids from the entire world and they will still be less than A single error from A single adult) which is EU to invite the president of Iran together with his scientific elite on tour around CERN and there to subject them to theoretical nuclear test i mean the Nuclear program of Iranian team to be theoretically examined and if they pass the test with satisfying grades then they should be awarded respectively. after this dedanoe guaranties Iranians on their own initiative will join the trend of international nuclear disarming.

Macedonian saying: спознај си го непријателот да ти постанит пријателче (once you learn your great enemy he becomes your little friend cause to know it is to own it). viruses are our own revolutionary cells which were neglected by the defensive general (the brain) and hence had to self organize against all the troubles including the very brain of the abandoned organism due to his laziness that they consider as danger.

[Reef Badlaw]

The strength becomes a weakness. -The Khrushchev Syndrome. " I have my finger on a nuke-trigger and the World still treats me like an immature child ! "

[Ningishiddza]

The strength becomes a weakness.

No. The US fears an Iran with nuclear power, because it will stabilize Iran and elevate it to a regional economic power that will compete with the US (and Israel).

Of the dual-reactors at Bushehr, one is intended to power desalinzation plants along the [Persian] Gulf coast, and the other is intended to provide electrical power to the interior of the country.

That will allow Iran to do a number of things:

1) Increase its agricultural output. Iran will become more self-sufficient and rely less on agricultural imports.

2) It will allow Iran to shut down natural gas and oil fired electrical power plants and divert that oil and natural gas to the world market, or to divert it to petro-chemical processing, which happens to be water and electricity intensive. That will allow Iran to compete in the world market (with the US) in the petro-chemical industry.

3) The new jobs created will drastically reduce the unemployment rate (generally over 20%) and shift Iran from a welfare state to an elementary and primary economic state, and that will allow Iran to shift to a tertiary economy later.

As that happens, it will block the US from ever gaining control of Iran, and without control of Iran, the US will not be able to control Central Asia, and without control of Central Asia, the US will never be able to control the eastern Russian republics, and without the eastern Russian republics, the US Empire will collapse.

[dedanoe]

from my sch experience



1) body to body is gravity
2) mind to mind is electric
3) your mind to my body is weak nuclear
4) my mind to your body is strong nuclear

as the it is pointed out on the figure there are three ways two subjects to interact: 1) yin along the regular circle like 0; 2) yang along the twisted circle like 8; 3) tao both of them. there is no doubt that USA and Iran are trying to interact and what i sense as trouble in USA-Iran interactions is their common insisting on say, the first type of interaction when in fact they should try the second type of interaction.

i also sense that Germans are about design; Italians are about food; Chinese are about shaolin; Britain is about dignity; Spanish are about flamengo; as for Americans they are best at making things practical. i am saying this because out of my decade in innovations and theorizing levers i know for sure that one innovation or theory becomes new state of technique when the principle it propagates first reflects well on the very author and later it is capable of mass production (the doctor covers the single special case as the engineer governs the general principle).

what i find questionable in the case of Iranian Nuclear Program is the limited approach to this dangerous field. for instance, they do not follow the other aspects of the ongoing process old for more than two decades. i am talking about the process of hydrogen fusion (this would be the small democratic societies) into helium (this would be the world in the age of the sun) which was initiated with the fall of communism (this would be the little fission trigger releasing the needed energy to start the hydrogen fusion).

Iranian leadership doesn't recognize this global trend of WORLDLY CHAOSIFICATION and hence it is primarily pushed to reconsider its position in the world and finally take adequate action, instead of which the misinformed Iranians fear they should defend from unknown danger. i don't think America poses danger to Iran. why America doesn't pose danger to Dubai for instance?

if i may just add this paragraph: back in Y2K when the Macedonian police officers asked me what do i plan to do with the kitchen knife in my hands and could we negotiate the release of my mother (they considered her as my hostage) i told them i am doing the hydrogen bomb principle, they evaluated me as incalculable, they called for backup and things went so much out of control that in the end before i earned my sch label i stubbed my mother with the cold weapon. Iran don't let the same happen to you.