Israeli forces kill Syrian, Lebanese, Gazan protesters on Nakba Day

[MaxBooBoo]

Is that the Israeli version of "crowd control"? Reminds me of what's going on in Libya and Syria...

http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7...068846,00.html

http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7...068829,00.html

http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7...068838,00.html

[MaxBooBoo]

Casualties have risen to 8; 4 Lebanese, 4 Syrians killed by IDF forces.

[Beatnik Bob]

First, stop using your single biased link.

Secondly, it was NOT IDF, it was Jerusalem police. So your link is wrong.

The Jerusalem Post has at least reported the basic facts:

http://www.jpost.com/Features/InThes...aspx?id=220550

[MaxBooBoo]

First, stop using your single biased link.

Secondly, it was NOT IDF, it was Jerusalem police. So your link is wrong.

Oh, ok. It's completely wrong. You know what? You are wrong. It's still Israeli forces shooting unarmed protesters. They shoot to kill. They might as well aim for the legs, but they aim for vital parts. That's not how you put an end to a riot in a civilized country. This is slaughtering of civilians. Who cares whether it's the IDF or some police force? You know who's in command.

[Beatnik Bob]

Egyptian forces have done the same thing.

At least 40 Egyptian protesters were injured because Egyptian security forces stepped in.

[MaxBooBoo]

Right... Egyptians forces have shot at Egyptian people because they protested against Israel. Now whom do they serve? It's plain to see and I hope the Egyptian generals will face the same fate as Muburak.

[Anarch]

What does egypt have to do with anything?

OP story headline is about

Israeli forces kill Syrian, Lebanese, Gazan protesters on Nakba Day

Egypt does not enter in....

To cite them as a shooter of there own people is arbitrary. Name one government that has not fired upon its own people... You can't because everywhere in every government when the peasants get pissed the kings have swords run through them to remind them of their place.

Egypt , america, brazil, they all do it...

But this story is about

Israeli forces kill Syrian, Lebanese, Gazan protesters on Nakba Day

Syria and Lebanon are on the hit list. So they fired upon unarmed protesters... killing innocents...I bet they will receive medals for heroically pulling the trigger on unarmed civilians. . Sick sad and fucked up.

[Beatnik Bob]

Right... Egyptians forces have shot at Egyptian people because they protested against Israel. Now whom do they serve? It's plain to see and I hope the Egyptian generals will face the same fate as Muburak.

They did it in Egypt because the protests got way out of hand. They were not peaceful protests.

And I was pointing this out because the thread seems slightly biased against Israel. Israel deserves plenty of criticism, but they should not be singled out on an issue of Nakba day crowd control.

[tahn1000]

You're absolutely right. Anyone who peacefully protests on their side of the border deserves to be shot, if only because they were foolish enough to believe that they would be safe from israeli bullets in their own countries.

[tahn1000]

First, stop using your single biased link.

Secondly, it was NOT IDF, it was Jerusalem police. So your link is wrong.

The Jerusalem Post has at least reported the basic facts:

http://www.jpost.com/Features/InThes...aspx?id=220550

Oh. And that ynews site IS the site of an israeli national news paper - the YEDIOTH AHRONOTH. Which means it's not biased, but BOASTING.

[Justice]

Funney how the zionst banksters are screwing every home owner and working man in the USA and yet people try to defend them.

Boy the propaganda from the zionist controlled press must be strong in some places.

Maybe americans are scared they will use some of their 200 ilegal nukes and turn the USA to glass if you don't all do as you are told and keep handing over cash and using military thugs to protect corporate profits.

Got new for you guys !

The world is not buying it and the rights of 1.5bn muslims is far greater then the rights of 15m jews who commit war crimes day after day as exposed on the internet because the media is under the control of the zionists.

[Anarch]

you're absolutely right. Anyone who peacefully protests on their side of the border deserves to be shot, if only because they were foolish enough to believe that they would be safe from israeli bullets in their own countries.

+ 1

[Beatnik Bob]

You're absolutely right. Anyone who peacefully protests on their side of the border deserves to be shot, if only because they were foolish enough to believe that they would be safe from israeli bullets in their own countries.

The same goes for Egypt, or any country.

[tahn1000]

I'm pretty sure the egyptian millitary doesn't take potshots at unsuspecting civillians across the border.

[RhymnRzn]

There's some pretty grim news today, reading about the bombing in Kurkuk, and evidently (I heard BBC radio reporting, but I've yet to find an article to link to) that Syria has tanks and troops engaged on the Lebanon border?

Russia and China will suspect other things are needful:

Russia will not back U.N. resolution on Syria: Medvedev

Obama has given forth his speech, and whatever happens to be agreeable (in theory) is to the chagrin of the Israel-can-do-no-wrong camp. But anything short in the recipe for healing the nations in a year of liberty and lifting border restrictions, among other things, would seem to practically put the sword in the hands of armies to respond with, and thus to conquer with (doing away with any so called two state solution, or peace with neighbors for that matter), when the multitudes cannot abide, and shift from the untenable pressures. If only all things could be done decently and in order.

With all that, the discernment must return to the Mystery Babylon working her work from the modern day Chaldea that is the United States. Their watchman gotta all be sitting up in their chairs thinking that their interpretation and sowing for the battle led by Gog-Magog is finally sprouting with all this rolling tumult (as though that thing is not the end-all event for the whole world, including the U.S.), and that their "whole-hearted" support for Israel will turn in many converts to Christ and blessings to their account.

[Beatnik Bob]

I'm pretty sure the egyptian millitary doesn't take potshots at unsuspecting civillians across the border.

Who said they did? Are you confusing Israel's Nakba day with Egypt's?

Read the article: http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/baby...538e8444f4970b

http://www.jpost.com/MiddleEast/Arti...id=220873&R=R3

[tahn1000]

No thanks. I've already read one israeli newspaper about it.

[Moishe3rd]

Interesting.

The various Arabs who got shot were not "across the border."
They were part of a planned cross border attack.
Many of them, mainly Syrians, managed to get across the border and into Israel.
The last time the Lebanese attacked Israel, it degenerated into a war between Israel and Hezbollah.

Why should Israel allow Arabs who want Israel to cease existing into Israel?
It better to give the death cultists what they want and simply shoot them...

[MaxBooBoo]

The various Arabs who got shot were not "across the border."
They were part of a planned cross border attack.
Many of them, mainly Syrians, managed to get across the border and into Israel.
The last time the Lebanese attacked Israel, it degenerated into a war between Israel and Hezbollah.

Why should Israel allow Arabs who want Israel to cease existing into Israel?
It better to give the death cultists what they want and simply shoot them...

Shooting unarmed civilians is prohibited by international law which applies to Israel too.
The situation is similar to the one on the US-Mexican border. US border guards don't shoot every single Mexican who's approaching the border.

[MaxBooBoo]

And I was pointing this out because the thread seems slightly biased against Israel. Israel deserves plenty of criticism, but they should not be singled out on an issue of Nakba day crowd control.

SLIGHTLY BIASED AGAINST ISRAEL? Israeli armed forces SHOT UNARMED CIVILIANS which is PROHIBITED BY INTERNATIONAL LAW. Oh, I forgot... when Israel shoots unarmed civilians and you call it shooting of unarmed civilians, it means you're biased. And when international law prohibits Israel from doing so and you notice it, you're biased too. Here's a link to a JPost article (which is an Israeli newspaper!). Even they have to admit that this kind of "crowd control" is illegal.

http://www.jpost.com/DiplomacyAndPol...aspx?id=220668

[RhymnRzn]

Interesting.

The various Arabs who got shot were not "across the border."
They were part of a planned cross border attack.
Many of them, mainly Syrians, managed to get across the border and into Israel.
The last time the Lebanese attacked Israel, it degenerated into a war between Israel and Hezbollah.

Why should Israel allow Arabs who want Israel to cease existing into Israel?
It better to give the death cultists what they want and simply shoot them...

But why ditch your glory and the sword which proceeds from your lips into the dirt and reach for those carnal weapons?

[tahn1000]

SLIGHTLY BIASED AGAINST ISRAEL? Israeli armed forces SHOT UNARMED CIVILIANS which is PROHIBITED BY INTERNATIONAL LAW. Oh, I forgot... when Israel shoots unarmed civilians and you call it shooting of unarmed civilians, it means you're biased. And when international law prohibits Israel from doing so and you notice it, you're biased too. Here's a link to a JPost article (which is an Israeli newspaper!). Even they have to admit that this kind of "crowd control" is illegal.

http://www.jpost.com/DiplomacyAndPol...aspx?id=220668

ynetnews is an israeli newspaper too.

[Moishe3rd]

Shooting unarmed civilians is prohibited by international law which applies to Israel too.
The situation is similar to the one on the US-Mexican border. US border guards don't shoot every single Mexican who's approaching the border.

Your point is moot.
The Syrians; Lebanese and other Arabs were not "approaching the border."
They were invading; crossing the border en masse and attacking the Israelis trying to prevent them.

Yes, the US border guards would, indeed, shoot foreign illegals who attacked them in large numbers as they were trying to illegally invade the US.

[tahn1000]

they were CIVILIANS protesting in their own countries, IF you had bothered to read the reports.

[Moishe3rd]

they were CIVILIANS protesting in their own countries, IF you had bothered to read the reports.

They were rioters storming the borders and, in the case of Syria, successful in their attempts - if you bothered to read the reports.