Ohm's resistance flaw -- it too should be lever

take two different channels with same water flowing in them consequentially. the same water means same volume cause water is impressible (not able to suppress) and from the equality of the volumes comes that L1 S1 = V = L2 S2 where L is the length and S is the cross section area and V is the volume. with leverian terms L simulates the distance and S simulates the weight (you're used to call it force by Newton's directive). now S1/L2 = P = S2/L1 is the pressure to enable the flow or demand for conductivity, the surge while L1/S2 = R = L2/S1 is the resistance cause if on greater surge you enlarge the length and shrink the area then you resist more or otherwise spoken with greater length visa vi smaller area you amortize the surge more effectively.

in comparison with the lever law, Ohm says: U = I R where R = r L/S so U = r I L/S... and that is what they call Newtonian fractional rationalism -- carrying only for one side of the lever equation. the error of his is that both L and S are properties of same wire. when every wire cares for its own flow then there's no interaction, they are all independent. it is not so. Ohm's flaw is said to be great breakthrough because unlike those before him that suggested the charge should distribute only along the most outer surface (it is of same polarity and same polarities repel) he gave a formulation where the flow depends on the cross section area of the wire. you can go even further back in Bernoulli's time or forth to Einstein but you won't find any thing more simple as the lever law of Archimedes and EDEN O Ahme.