+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 3 of 3
Oct 7th, 2011 7:08 AM #1
NFL Why move a team to LA when you can just start 2 new teams?
They keep talking about moving a team to LA. Why? Why not start a new team there and say, a new one in Oklahoma City? Oklahoma is a HUGE football state and would surely support their own team. And if in AFC South you have a OKC and Houston Rivalry. NFC East gives you OKC and Dallas Rivalry.
LA has the land, has the investors, great! But instead of moving say, the Bill or Jags, why not make a new AFC/NFC team there and do the same in a place like OKC? I thought maybe Las Vegas/just outside of it but that place is a desert and already struggles with lack of water. Maybe a team on the North Dakota South Dakota border and be the Dakota XYZ?
Gah I just don't wanna see a team move, especially the bills, cause my Pats love beating them down every year. *Whistles innocently as she pushes the sports page under her bed showing the Bill beat the Pats last time they played*
Non Alcoholic Beer is like a Vibrator without batteries. Fills you up but without the buzz.
Oct 7th, 2011 7:29 PM #2
I myself, dont want another team in LA...I want to see new teams created in places where there arent many teams..Id love to see Hawaiian's play football.. You could call them The Hawaiian Hammers Or something..Make those athletes play more games and earn there $$$$$$...That will keep them out of trouble..America is a two faced dictatorship, and the dictator is $$$$$$.
Oct 7th, 2011 9:18 PM #3
What about the talk about having teams go overseas to Europe for a few games. If they do some move like that, perhaps what they really would need is 4 more teams. I would think Los Angeles, Portland, San Antonio, and Las Vegas would surely have the economies to support an NFL franchise.I'd Rather Be A Right-Wing Nut Job Then A Liberal With No Nuts And No Job
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)